Moderna CEO in 2019: “Going to be a pandemic next year”?

What did he say? It sounds like Moderna's CEO said that when the pandemic happened in 2019, they made 100,000 doses that year, and then that: we need to make a billion doses next year because "there's going to be a pandemic". Did I hear that right?
28 min read
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

What did he say? It sounds like Moderna’s CEO said that when the pandemic happened in 2019, they made 100,000 doses that year, and then that: we need to make a billion doses next year because “there’s going to be a pandemic”. Did I hear that right?

World Economic Forum | DAVOS 2023 | Moderna & GAVI CEOs

Rumble | Telegram

  1. Stéphane Bancel, CEO: Moderna (also spelled as Stefan Bensel sometimes, even on WEF website)
  2. Seth Berkley, CEO: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance (GAVI = Gates)
  3. Maria Leptin, President of the European Research Council
  4. Michelle Williams, the Dean of Faculty, Harvard Chan School of Public Health (built from Rockefeller Foundation)

This is what I heard, what do you hear?

When the pandemic happened, Moderna made 100,000 dose in 2019 for a whole year. I remember walking after the office of my other manufacturing and I said, “How we make a billion dose next year?” And he look at me a bit funny, and say, “What?” I said, “Yeah, we need to make a billion doses next year, there’s going to be a pandemic.” — Stéphane Bancel, CEO: Moderna

They don’t hide it. You’re just not paying attention.

Timestamp: 00:21

… The best thing we can do is use the preventing methods, but also make sure we vaccinate our high-risk populations, so they’re protected against severe disease and death.

(Wearing his “SDG“)

Seth Berkley, CEO: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance

Timestamp: 00:32

Let’s go more a little bit into the new variants and sub variants, and I’m going to go with the Stephane Bancel. Let’s talk about vaccine development, because we’ve heard how it happened, obviously, with COVID-19 starting from 2022, and how extraordinary the process was also in terms of the speed. How is development adoption and scaling of vaccine going on when it comes to different variants and sub variants? Because this is one of the big concerns as we’re all here now, and we’re discussing, we understand the context, and this is a great deal.

Timestamp: 01:01

Sure, a good morning, and thank you for having me on the panel. So the great news versus 2020, where we are today is we have manufacturing capacity.

As Seth knows, when the pandemic happened, Moderna had made 100,000 doses in 2019 for the whole year, and I remember walking after that, I was into the office of my other manufacturing, and I said, how would make a billion doses next year? And he looked at me a bit funny, say what? I said, we need to make a billion doses next year, there’s going to be a pandemic, and so we are now, we have plants in the US, and in Switzerland.

We’ve shown this Summer, that we’re able to adapt to variants very quickly. If you think about it, in the US, Peter Marx, told us on June 28, we want for the US, a bivalent Omicron booster, and by early September on Labor Day Weekend, it was in US pharmacies, which, kind of, 60 days, which kind of, in the old world of vaccines will of been…

Five years. —Gavi

Yeah, I’m thinking about, and I was just telling Seth before this discussion that I’m very excited about Christmas, Moderna bought a Japanese company that has developed a new technology, a new $cience from Tokyo University, to shrink by two more weeks. The time to get from deciding the sequence, to having products ready. So it will not be ready for this summer for the booster that we’re going to need in the fall of 23, but potentially by the fall of 24, you might be ready, and so we keep on working on technologies to improve that. ^01

Stéphane Bancel, CEO: Moderna

Moderna Dna Manufacturer Japan Oriciro

The other piece that we are working on also, because Seth and I had many, many discussions over the last three years, as you can imagine, is how do we build manufacturing capacity around the world? We had a lot of export restriction during the pandemic, which was really, really painful for obvious reasons. Even from countries who say we will not limit export, trust me, they were, and so we are very excited now that we are building a factory in Canada. ^02 We already brought ground in the Fall. We are building a factory in Australia. (announced at Melbourne’s Centre for “Nanofabrication”) ^03 ^04 We are going to start the factory in the UK, ^05 ^06 and we’re also going to start building a factory in Kenya. ^07

Stéphane Bancel, CEO: Moderna

Moderna Factory Australia Monash
Moderna Factory Canada Trudeau

They’re not hiding it. You’re just not paying attention.

Moderna Centre For Nanofabrication Australia Morrison Hunt
Nanosensors Nanofabrication

Note: This is Greg Hunt (with former Australian PM Scott Morrison in the background). Greg Hunt was the World Economic Forum’s “Director of Strategy” in Geneva, Switzerland (2000-2001), named Global Leader for Tomorrow (2003), and named Best Minister in the World at the World Government Summit (2016). He trained at Klaus Schwab’s school for young global leaders and was Australia’s Federal Health Minister during Covid – the Biosecurity Act gave him authority over Australia’s strategy in March 2020. He’s also featured in my “Conflict$ in Australia” posts. ^08 ^09 ^10 ^11

He gets to retire with his big fat yellow envelope and enjoy his young family for the rest of their lives; whilst others lost their kids, parents, friends, jobs, lives, homes, or health to covid-vax-madne$$ / covid-ho$pital-protocol$ / the censoring of logical health advice, or lost their minds or common sense to covid-hysteria from the military-grade mind-control that played 24/7 on the tell-lie-vision, in social media, and in any business they didn’t destroy. ^12

He was featured in a photo with Schwab’s book “The Great Reset” and a clip of his video went viral around the world for announcing “The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever.”:

Greghunt Greatresetbook
Largest Global Vaccination Trial Ever Greg Hunt

If you don’t find it at least QUESTIONABLE that Moderna will be producing “mRNA vaccines” in Australia, announced by the PM & fmr WEF Director of Strategy, at Melbourne’s “Centre for NanoFabrication“, after EVERYTHING we’ve found out so far about what’s in the vials, and the larger global agenda, which has the synthetic biology crap weaved in, then I don’t know what else to say. I really don’t know what else to say.

So what does the Centre for Nanofabrication do anyway?

Biosensors 1 Nanomelbourne
Biosensors 2 Nanomelbourne

Same name keeps appearing in the papers, the Director, Professor Nicolas Voelcker.

Tweet Voelckerlab Nanotech Drugs
Tweet Nicolashvoelcker
Tweet Benjamineggleton

He received over $3 million dollars in 2022 to develop ‘Wearable and Implantable Biosensors” (an apparent $150 billion market), who is also a Professor, and “CSIRO Science Leader”. ^49 ^50 ^51 ^52 ^53

2022laureatefellowship Prof Nicolas Voelcker
2019 Atse Prof Nicolas Voelcker
Nicolasvoelcker

They’ve developed one of those Bill Gates investments, the microneedle patch…and this is even more relevant for something I’m still researching), and that is the pH level monitoring aspect of their invention. ^54 ^55

Tweet Larsesser
Pubmed Profvoelcker Wearablemicroneedle

It’s relevant because we found on the Obama Whitehouse archives (2010), an intelligent (self-aware) sensor, that is a multi-functional, self-assembling nano-sized protein, found in every cell of the human body, that can be controlled by pH.

Another thing to be paid for by us, funded to military, defence and big-pharma, and sold to the public as something to “keep us safe”, “save lives” from the “other” boogie-man (not them of course, they would never hurt you)… “100,000,000,000% safe and effective, safe and effective, we’re here to help you, rah rah rah.”

Especially ignore the fact that it’s parent company (ExQori) creates Internet of Things self-aware quantum technology that “unifies nanotechnology, biotechnology, IT, and Cognitive science”. “Transforming All Into One” which claims to combine HealthCare.gov to a self-aware cognitive cloud, that connects providers, industry, science, financial, medical, patient, and government data into an apparent “non-AI”, “globally unified, cognitive cloud”, and remotely and intelligently monitor’s medical conditions and drug “compliance”, as well as suggested “dosing adjustments”.

We are talking to a couple more countries, because I would really like on every continent to have mRNA capacity, because amazing thing about mRNA is you can use the same facility, the same plant, the same machines to make any vaccine you want. For example, in our last night, we announced we have positive data on our RSV vaccine for phase three, with a very high 84% significant efficacy on the vaccine. As many of you know, there is no vaccine against RSV, and too many people get sick and die every year of RSV. Both in the elderly and also it’s a big problem for toddlers, and so we can use exactly the same machines in the same plant to make the other vaccines. So the flexibility is what I think also give me hopes, not only for the variants, that “nature” might throw at us, but also for other vaccines.

Stéphane Bancel, CEO: Moderna

(RSV = they are coming for your Kids next time)

Timestamp: 04:02

Well, it’s interesting how you say that three years ago, some of these speed and some of those days, and how you say this, and now we can speed it up even more. Something like that was not even possible or thinkable to be discussed three years ago, even when we went into COVID, right? But Maria Leptin, I want to bring it to a little bit of a different aspect with you here, because COVID-19 pandemic illustrated also the difficulties and the risks of $cience denial, and three years into it, we’re still having lots of that, and this is such an important issue here. The highlighted importance of $cience, and I know you’re passionate about that. How do you see the situation now, has it improved or not?

Timestamp: 04:43

I wish it had improved. I am passionate about $cience, and it’s an interesting question. Perhaps interestingly, to the countries which were most successful in getting good coverage of vaccination, based this, not at all, on getting their citizens to try and understand the $cience.

One is Bhutan, which, where they were very successful in preparing a campaign, and involved—they asked, they were sensitive to the country’s needs, to the citizen’s needs—involved in forming the religious establishment, and in fact using them in finding the right time and date, and they got fantastic coverage. No $cience was explained.

Maria Leptin, President of the European Research Council

Oh my god, Bhutan used Astrology…

…because the country was full of “vaccine hesitancy”… ^57

Bhutan Vax All Adults
Bhutanbuddhistrituals

Oh, there you go…

their leaders are sell-outs too…

They are using the pandemic as an “opportunity to Reset ourselves“… will ‘bring in “Digital ID” as a build-up to a “Big Data system”, have a complete “Education Reform”, have an “Integrated Taxation System”, and their Central bank is piloting Digital Currency.

Bhutan on its Progress to ‘Reset’ their Country

  • Lotay Tshering, Prime Minister, Kingdom of Bhutan, addresses the general debate of the 76th Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations (New York, 21-27 September 2021).
  • (At least their citizens get a heads-up I guess… most Aussies don’t even know this is happening)

The other example I know of is Portugal, where the campaign was handed to retired army general, and the army general just treated the country as his troops, and he rallied the troops. He declared it as a war that the country in patriotic passion was going to fight together, and they had up there—I think they were leading in Europe, if not the world.

So, no $cience. Let’s remember that. Good planning, good thinking and integration. One country and the right sort of attitude and another.

Maria Leptin, President of the European Research Council

WTF that sounds F*KN INSANE?!?

More-so… here’s the aftermath of your “Fake-Funded-Science: WAR on Humanity”

According to Statista, Portugal has the highest vaccination rate of any country in Europe aside from the tiny island of Malta. 70% have received boosters. ^58

The New York Times ran an article about Portugal the previous year: “there is no one left to vaccinate”. ^59

Yet, Portugal now has the highest case rate and COVID death rate per capita in Europe and the second highest COVID fatality rate in the world behind Taiwan, according to Our World in Data. ^60

Portugal —
2nd highest “Covid” Deaths…
highest “Covid” “Cases”

In Portugal, There
Portugal Worldindata
  • Video (Mark Steyn on Portugal)
  • Telegram (1 min Clip)

Mark Steyn: “So, look here: the least vaccinated country in Europe is Bulgaria, which also has the lowest excess mortality … mhhh … and the most vaccinated country in Europe is Malta, which is not included in the excess mortality statistics. So let’s move on to the second most vaccinated country in Europe: Portugal. And there is the highest excess mortality. So the country with the lowest vaccination rate has the most low excess mortality, while the country with the highest vaccination rate has the highest excess mortality. All together now: “Correlation… is not Causation”.

  • Video (Dr John Campbell) UNEXPLAINED DEATHS AT RECORD LEVELS!

“In June, Portugal recorded the highest excess mortality in Europe of 23.9% vs a European average of 6.7%. New Zealand is similar, with 5-10% excess mortality depending on the demographic. Vaccine advocates will immediate say “correlation isn’t causation” yet they used such argumentation to claim the unvaccinated were dying at higher rates. The truth is the unvaccinated have largely come through better, whilst things are looking bleak for the vaccinated who seem to be suffering from an array of acute and long term problems, ranging from skin infections and lingering coughs to myocarditis and strokes.”

  • “Coincidentally”, Paulo Portas, Portugal Minister of State and Foreign Affairs. was also at the Bilderberg 2022 meeting. ^61 ^62
  • See also: (20 Min Presentation: Jessica Rose in Portugal)  Congresso Internacional sobre Gestão de Pandemias/Saúde (INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS on Pandemic/Health Management) ^63 ^64

Back to “$cience”; or rather the true “Science-Deniers”…

Scientists, we $cientists, and I’m totally behind the scientists who were asked constantly at the beginning of the campaign, we did what $cientists do. We expressed our knowledge and our uncertainty. I mean, the spoof on this and “Don’t Look Up,” was wonderful.

(Oh my God, she’s praising “Don’t Look Up”)

93% certain, means 7% possible that the comet won’t… why should we worry? (UMM… but your 90% statistic was a lie from the start and got worse and worse as the data came in… so what is wrong with you? It is NOT a good comparison—you are delusional and dangerous, and blinded by either an agenda or dollar signs.) And so I don’t blame any of the $cientists in my own country, Germany, nor Fauci (Fraud-chi) in America, or any other scientist who pronounced publicly. The trouble is that many citizens don’t understand uncertainty as part of the scientific method, and if I say today, “This is my best belief with that uncertainty,” and somebody else says tomorrow, “You didn’t do that experiment right… you didn’t…” That’s the way we are. So we’ve got to go so profoundly into educating citizens about the scientific method if we want better trust in $cience, and the bad news is, who is it going to be? It’s not going to be us (DAMN STRAIGHT!—you genocidal maniac!) because we’re the ones who are mistrusted. I’m now a Brussels $cientific official. You represent academia, can never trust them. Industry even worse. I mean, Seth is the only one who can be halfway trusted (HELL. NO!).

So what I’m saying is, if we want to address those who don’t, who have this mistrust in $cience, we’re the wrong ones and we’ve got to start somewhere completely else.

Maria Leptin, President of the European Research Council

(You and your vaccine-$ales-people will NEVER regain our trust—NEVER.)

But let’s expand this. It’s such an important issue when it comes to the distrust in $cience, and I want to address all the speakers here. If that’s not up to you, who can do that better? And how can we make this more of an organized way to get better result at the end?

Let me start because I think it’s really important. The worst thing we did in the US was, when people expressed hesitancy or curiosity, we basically said to them, “Follow the $cience,” and that’s the absolute wrong thing to do. (Especially when the “Science” wasn’t supporting your fake-narrative, but do go on…) What you have to do, if you’re really interested in communicating, information that will motivate people to change their behaviour, you have to take the approach of meeting them where they are, explaining it, and presenting the information in a way where they will adopt the desirable behaviour and feel good about it, and maybe that was the secret sauce to what happened in Portugal (err… treating it like a military war, and putting them in the second-highest death and highest-sickness category?? that’s your “secret sauce?”) and in Bhutan (errrr……..making sure the planets are aligned & going all-in on a totalitarian digital reset??).

Health communicators (Military = “Health Communicators?”) and scientists worked to communicate the risks and what we understand today, and in doing that, helped people understand that the scientific process is iterative, and not all of us are math literates. So when we speak in probability, we are going to lose our audience. So all of us have to begin to realize that we have to stop our professional scientific speak or engage others who can translate for us and meet people where they are. (Guys, I think they’re going to remove the statistics next time, so we can’t find out / prove they are killing us). If we do that, it’ll be the stepping stone of building trust. Governance, regulation and governance and national leadership really did not help us.

Michelle Williams, the Dean of Faculty, Harvard Chan School of Public Health

But it also was, I mean, if you look at vaccine hesitancy in a normal time frame, people think this is a problem in the developing world. It tended not to be a problem in the developing world because you look to your friends and colleagues and you see the diseases, and so every parent, every person wants the protection. (You mean, countries where their nutrition is killing their health vs countries who have better nutrition… of course, that is what you would mean if you weren’t trying to make billion$ on vaccines…) The big problem was in places where vaccines were so effective that the diseases had disappeared, and then you can say, well, do I want to take this vaccine that has a side effect or is it organic or does it have this or that? And that was where we were. That was so interesting.

What you didn’t mention was the intentionality, the politicization of the process. There was also attacks that were done. There were bots in social media that were putting out misinformation on both sides, and lastly, and this is what’s completely different, is today, a rumour spreads literally at the speed of light. So what happens is you have in my own country, Michelle is talking about the US. I’m obviously American, although I live in Switzerland. It was amazing the amount of misinformation that was there, and that information then went straight to the rest of the world, and so all of a sudden you have the way we normally deal with misinformation (You mean “Inconvenient, Unprofitable Truths?”) is we get the local chief, the local religious leader, the local healthcare workers who are trusted, but all of a sudden they’re like, but look at what’s going on in Germany or in the US or in other places and here’s what I’m getting in my social media, and that has been a real problem. So the trust goes even broader. We don’t trust the institutions, we have misinformation, and it’s getting worse, not better.

Seth Berkley, CEO: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance

(Because we’re onto you now, we trusted you before, we were naïve to the extent of evil in this world, but evil locked us in our homes with nothing but the internet, and instead of playing games and watching Netflix, some of us figured you out!)

The extent of this misinformation (truth) when it comes to vaccination I think has as somebody who works in the media. I mean, that was just overwhelming to see all of that across all the channels, right?

Yes, and I exactly agree with panellists, which is I think in some countries, you know, also scientific debate in national TV at prime time. So you can imagine that people were scared. You know, (inaudible) said a lot of political debate in some countries and the US was kind of maybe one of the worst places in the world, and you saw the differences of countries where all the parties would say, you know, this had been approved by the regulators, clinical studies have been done, you should get your vaccines and so on, and as Seth said, I mean, the social media was just terrible. Just terrible. So at the time of uncertainty where people were scared for their loved ones, you know, many people, you know, locked down. It was very hard for everybody from just a mental health standpoint. When you, you capitalize with all that environment, you could see some countries where you had scientific debate and political debate, and social media, if you have those three things, they have a vaccine rate, very, very low.

(Yeah, when we found out you were lying about the science; it tends to make one not want to hold their arms out… and start sharing the true stats everywhere to try and save as many as we can…)

Stéphane Bancel, CEO: Moderna

Absolutely.

Last 20 posts tagged: Moderna (Murder-ner)




References/Footnotes:
  1. Moderna makes its first-ever acquisition, buying Japanese DNA manufacturer OriCiro for $85M https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/moderna-makes-its-first-ever-acquisition-buying-japanese-dna-manufacturer-oriciro ↥
  2. Moderna Montreal factory will make Canada an mRNA ‘leader,’ says Trudeau https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/moderna-montreal-factory-will-make-canada-an-mrna-leader-says-trudeau-1.5881671 ↥
  3. Breaking ground: Moderna’s big build begins https://www.monash.edu/medicine/news/latest/2022-articles/breaking-ground-modernas-big-build-begins ↥
  4. Prime Minister Scott Morrison is speaks to media at the Melbourne Centre for Nanofabrication about Moderna producing mRNA vaccines in Australia for the first time. https://www.smh.com.au/national/australia-signs-contracts-with-moderna-to-build-melbourne-mrna-manufacturing-facility-20220324-p5a7fm.html ↥
  5. Moderna and UK government sign deal to establish mRNA facility https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/news/moderna-uk-mrna-facility/ ↥
  6. Moderna picks Oxfordshire for future UK manufacturing and R&D site https://www.fiercepharma.com/manufacturing/moderna-finds-home-british-research-and-manufacturing-plant-waiting ↥
  7. Moderna to Build Facility in Kenya https://www.voanews.com/a/6475281.html ↥
  8. Conflict$ in Australia https://pennybutler.com/covid-conflict-of-interest-australia/ ↥
  9. Greg Hunt named ‘best minister in the world’ https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/greg-hunt-named-best-minister-in-the-world-20160209-gmpc46.html ↥
  10. Young Global Leaders https://pennybutler.com/young-global-leaders/ ↥
  11. Greg Hunt Biography – Global Leader for Tomorrow https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/minister-hunts-biography ↥
  12. Covid-Bots Create “COVID Hysteria” To Manipulate Public Opinion & Govt Policies https://pennybutler.com/covid-bots-create-covid-hysteria/ ↥
  13. Melbourne Centre for Nanofabrication Videos – https://nanomelbourne.com/video/yonggang-zhu-microfluidic-chips-for-sensing-applications/ | Yonggang Zhu – Microfluidic chips for sensing applications https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxPpPn1-CLk ↥
  14. Melbourne Centre for Nanofabrication Publications https://nanomelbourne.com/news-events/publications/ ↥
  15. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — Xiao, J., Zhan, H., Wang, X. et al. Electrolyte gating in graphene-based supercapacitors and its use for probing nanoconfined charging dynamics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 683–689 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0704-7 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-020-0704-7 ↥
  16. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — Broadway, D.A., Dontschuk, N., Tsai, A. et al. Spatial mapping of band bending in semiconductor devices using in situ quantum sensors. Nat Electron 1, 502–507 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0130-0 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-018-0130-0 ↥
  17. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — Garg, V., Kamaliya, B., Mote, R., & Fu, J. (2020). Enhanced light-matter interactions in size tunable graphene–gold nanomesh. MRS Communications, 10(1), 135-140. doi:10.1557/mrc.2019.162 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/mrs-communications/article/abs/enhanced-lightmatter-interactions-in-size-tunable-graphenegold-nanomesh/23EBCA3795521B149294992A91C77D4D ↥
  18. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — Kasry, A., Fadlallah, M. M., Voelcker, N. H., & Maarouf, A. A. (2019). Experimental and theoretical demonstrations of ultraviolet absorption enhancement in porous nano-membrane graphene. Carbon, 155, 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.08.038 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0008622319308425 ↥
  19. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — Solid source growth of graphene with Ni–Cu catalysts: towards high quality in situ graphene on silicon https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/handle/10072/341603 ↥
  20. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — Efficient Excitation of Multiple Plasmonic Modes on Three-Dimensional Graphene: An Unexplored Dimension Jingchao Song, Lei Zhang, Yunzhou Xue, Qing Yang Steve Wu, Fang Xia, Chao Zhang, Yu-Lin Zhong, Yupeng Zhang, Jinghua Teng, Malin Premaratne, Cheng-Wei Qiu, and Qiaoliang BaoACS Photonics 2016 3 (10), 1986-1992DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00566 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00566 ↥
  21. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — p-Type Epitaxial Graphene on Cubic Silicon Carbide on Silicon for Integrated Silicon Technologies Aiswarya Pradeepkumar, Mojtaba Amjadipour, Neeraj Mishra, Chang Liu, Michael S. Fuhrer, Avi Bendavid, Fabio Isa, Marcin Zielinski, Hansika I. Sirikumara, Thushari Jayasekara, D. Kurt Gaskill, and Francesca IacopiACS Applied Nano Materials 2020 3 (1), 830-841DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.9b02349 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsanm.9b02349 ↥
  22. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — Adhesion and Self-Assembly of Lubricin (PRG4) Brush Layers on Different Substrate Surfaces Mingyu Han, Saimon M. Silva, Weiwei Lei, Anita Quigley, Robert M. I. Kapsa, Simon E. Moulton, and George W. Greene Langmuir 2019 35 (48), 15834-15848DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01809 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01809 ↥
  23. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — Free-Standing 2D Nanoassemblies Qianqian Shi, Wenlong Cheng 19 July 2019 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201902301 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adfm.201902301 ↥
  24. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — A General Approach to Free-Standing Nanoassemblies via Acoustic Levitation Self-Assembly Qianqian Shi, Wenli Di, Dashen Dong, Lim Wei Yap, Lin Li, Duyang Zang, and Wenlong Cheng ACS Nano 2019 13 (5), 5243-5250DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b09628 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsnano.8b09628 ↥
  25. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — Temperature-induced self-assembly and metal-ion stabilization of histidine functional block copolymers Emma R. L. Brisson, James C. Griffith, Ayana Bhaskaran, George V. Franks, Luke A. Connal First published: 18 March 2019 https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.29351 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pola.29351 ↥
  26. Melb Centre for Nanofabrication — Self-Assembly of Nano- to Macroscopic Metal–Phenolic Materials Gyeongwon Yun, Quinn A. Besford, Stuart T. Johnston, Joseph J. Richardson, Shuaijun Pan, Matthew Biviano, and Frank Caruso Chemistry of Materials 2018 30 (16), 5750-5758 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02616 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02616 ↥
  27. Size Selective Adsorption of Gold Nanoparticles by Electrostatic Assembly Julian A. Lloyd, Soon Hock Ng, Timothy J. Davis, Daniel E. Gómez, and Udo Bach The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2017 121 (4), 2437-2443 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10218 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10218 ↥
  28. DNA-Directed Self-Assembly of Core-Satellite Plasmonic Nanostructures: A Highly Sensitive and Reproducible Near-IR SERS Sensor https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adfm.201202073 ↥
  29. High-strength Ni/Al nanolaminates fabricated by magnetron sputtering and their nanoindentation and nanowear behaviors 2019 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2589152919300596 ↥
  30. Real-Time and In-Situ Monitoring of H2O2 Release from Living Cells by a Stretchable Electrochemical Biosensor Based on Vertically Aligned Gold Nanowires 2019 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02610 ↥
  31. Black silicon as a platform for bacterial detection 2015 https://pubs.aip.org/aip/bmf/article-abstract/9/6/061101/386260/Black-silicon-as-a-platform-for-bacterial?redirectedFrom=fulltext ↥
  32. Free-Standing Bilayered Nanoparticle Superlattice Nanosheets with Asymmetric Ionic Transport Behaviors 2015 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsnano.5b04784 ↥
  33. Tattoolike Polyaniline Microparticle-Doped Gold Nanowire Patches as Highly Durable Wearable Sensors 2015 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsami.5b05001 ↥
  34. Highly Stretchy Black Gold E-Skin Nanopatches as Highly Sensitive Wearable Biomedical Sensors 2015 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/aelm.201400063 ↥
  35. Versatile SERS sensing based on black silicon 2015 https://opg.optica.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-23-5-6763&id=312646# ↥
  36. Vertical Nanowire Electrode Arrays as Novel Electrochemical Label-Free Immunosensors https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201403540 ↥
  37. Giant Plasmene Nanosheets, Nanoribbons, and Origami 2014 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/nn504615a ↥
  38. Core-Spun Carbon Nanotube Yarn Supercapacitors for Wearable Electronic Textiles 2014 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nn5001386 ↥
  39. Solid-state sensors monitoring parameters of water quality for the next generation of wireless sensor networks 2012 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925400511009968 ↥
  40. Living specimens under field immobilization and smartphone microscopic observation 2019 https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jemt.23340 ↥
  41. Skin inspired fractal strain sensors using a copper nanowire and graphite microflake hybrid conductive network https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2016/nr/c6nr04056j#!divAbstract ↥
  42. Surface activation of CNT Webs towards layer by layer assembly of biosensors https://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2016/AN/C5AN02547H#!divAbstract ↥
  43. Hydrogels with Tunable Properties https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-4939-2938-2_8 ↥
  44. Skin in the diagnostics game: Wearable biosensor nano- and microsystems for medical diagnostics 2020 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1748013219303147 ↥
  45. Gel-Mediated Electrospray Assembly of Silica Supraparticles for Sustained Drug Delivery 2018 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsami.8b10415 ↥
  46. Spatially Controlled Surface Modification of Porous Silicon for Sustained Drug Delivery Applications 2019 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-37750-w ↥
  47. Differential functionalisation of the internal and external surfaces of carbon-stabilised nanoporous silicon https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2019/cc/c9cc03755a/unauth#!divAbstract ↥
  48. Micro- and Nanosystems for Advanced Transdermal Delivery 2019 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adtp.201900141 ↥
  49. Nicolas Voelcker Biography Research Interest https://biomaterials.insightconferences.com/ocm/2017/nicolas-voelcker-university-of-south-australia-australia ↥
  50. ATSE 2019 Professor Nicolas Voelcker https://www.atse.org.au/news-and-events/article/professor-nicolas-voelcker-nano-materials-scientist/ ↥
  51. UniversalBioSensors.com—Prof. Nicolas Voelcker https://www.universalbiosensors.com/staff/prof-nicolas-voelcker/ ↥
  52. Melbourne Centre for Nanofabrication Strategic Plan 2023-2028 https://nanomelbourne.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/ANFF-VIC_Strategic-Plan_2023-2028.pdf ↥
  53. Melbourne Centre for Nanofabrication – your Tax dollars at work — Government funding $50 million — https://nanomelbourne.com/about-us/governance-and-network/ ↥
  54. Tweet – @Lars_Esser — Collaborative projects are one of the best things in #science. Together with @voelcker_lab, we just published a #wearable microneedle array-based #sensor for transdermal monitoring of pH levels in @ElsevierConnect’s Biosensors and Bioelectronics (IF 13) https://twitter.com/Lars_Esser/status/1597920446103506944 ↥
  55. Bioengineered Clathrin Quantum Cognitive Sensors (ExQor / ExQori∆ / Xenqai) https://pennybutler.com/exqor/ ↥
  56. Dervisevic M, Dervisevic E, Esser L, Easton CD, Cadarso VJ, Voelcker NH. Wearable microneedle array-based sensor for transdermal monitoring of pH levels in interstitial fluid. Biosens Bioelectron. 2023 Feb 15;222:114955. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114955. Epub 2022 Nov 25. PMID: 36462430. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0956566322009952?via%3Dihub ↥
  57. Buddhist Rituals and Covid Vaccination in Bhutan https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/southasia/2022/10/10/buddhist-rituals-and-covid-vaccination-in-bhutan/ “Given the widespread misinformation which fuelled vaccine hesitancy particularly in relation to AstraZeneca around the world, Bhutan tackled it by resorting to Buddhist rituals and astrological forecasting. The roll-out was therefore delayed until 27 March 2021, sitting on vaccines for months.” ↥
  58. Number of COVID-19 vaccine doses administered in Europe, by country https://www.statista.com/statistics/1196071/covid-19-vaccination-rate-in-europe-by-country/ ↥
  59. In Portugal, There Is Virtually No One Left to Vaccinate https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/world/europe/portugal-vaccination-rate.html ↥
  60. Portugal: Coronavirus Pandemic Country Profile https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus/country/portugal ↥
  61. Bilderberg Meeting June 2022 https://pennybutler.com/bilderberg-june-2022/ ↥
  62. [NWO] Bilderberg Group (Hollywood Actor Investigates) https://pennybutler.com/bilderberg-nwo/ ↥
  63. Jessica Rose Presentation in Portugal https://odysee.com/@MartaGB:2/Jessica-Rose:5 ↥
  64. INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS on Pandemic/Health Management Medical-Scientific Conference https://conf-gestao-pandemia.com/ ↥
Tags
Share the love (use discernment sharing censored topics)

Random Related Posts