Time for the truth on the presence of graphene in the shots

It’s not far-fetched to suspect that it is likely Graphene in vaccines, and when I personally heard this rumour (and was magnetic myself), I downloaded a lot of graphene information. Unfortunately my downloads are not organized into a singular “Graphene” folder because it depends on what I was researching that day and whether I was in the mindset of “that’s preposterous and impossible!” or whether I had stumbled upon something more concrete, as in “…could use in a court of law” where I was forced to treat it seriously (such as Patents and Research Publications). When I have time, I’ll move all the research into the one folder and update this post with the link.

Back then, I didn’t know that they’ve started to put Graphene in EVERYTHING – Clothes, Masks, Bandages, Air, Water, Food, Agriculture, Geoengineering, Medicines, Ointments, Buildings and more. So the discussion should probably move from speculation of whether it’s in the vaccine to having to deal with this toxic-monster.

Although Pharma-Funded Fact-Checkers, COVID-19 Vaccine manufacturers, Pharma-Funded Media, and Government Health Authorities deny that Graphene is an ingredient in the vials, it hasn’t been “debunked” yet because not only is it ‘transparent’, there are “trade-secrets on the IP’s” that obfuscate the actual concoction that make up the list of ingredients they’ve published (i.e. what ‘makes up’ the lipids they use, the excipients, the adjuvants, the fact that they have different ‘versions’ in the FDA-docs etc., it’s all a bit of a top secret / classified “mystery”… ) I hope that makes sense, if not, keep reading, I will reference everything.

Everyday, we receive more and more data that raises even more questions about what the hell is in these vials. Some scientists say the real problem is the LNP’s – “focus on the Lipids – Graphene is just a smoke-screen”. While others say that Graphene Toxicity is the real “COVID-19” sickness, particularly because the symptoms of Graphene-Oxide exposure are identical.

Let’s have a look and see what information we have so far and what the researchers are saying.

In any case, Graphene is something we’re going to have to deal with (whether it’s injected into us or not) – it’s literally being promoted as the most exciting thing – billions have been invested in it, even from governments, and ‘the science’ has already been overrun with promo’s that people are going to cite to promote their products (whilst purposefully ignoring the damage it can do) – but there’s no avoiding it – so whatever is really going on, we still need to learn what we can about it.

For a thousand reasons that wouldn’t fit into this section… but basically everyone’s gone mad… the world is corrupt / upside-down / inverse… corruption and fear have run ramped, and even good people have been sucked-into it…

A Google Patent search alone for “graphene oxide vaccine” brought up over 45,000 results last year.

Google Patent Search

Nano coronavirus recombinant vaccine taking graphene oxide as carrier

Preparation and application of pachyman nano adjuvant based on graphene oxide and adjuvant/antigen co-delivery vaccine

That same search today (March 26, 2022) brings up 47,502 results.

Who has time to go through all those patents?

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

Patents (“Graphene Oxide Vaccine”)

See also: Karen Kingston section below (Former Pfizer employee and bioanalyst) for Suspect Vaccine Patents

The adjuvants used in vaccines are damaging (on purpose) to illicit a stronger immune-response. So they purposefully add various contaminants in the vaccines by design, and apparently this is scientifically-accepted.

But what is quite alarming to me, is that even though they are experimenting on the global population right now, with never-before used excipients & adjuvants & technology with no long-term safety data, that is rushed-to-market with no promises, using a computer-upload from Wuhan as their model, and ‘trade-secret’ hidden ingredients, and materials used from over 19 countries and over 80 suppliers, their safety follow-up is limited to two months past Dose 2 ^{^007 ^008}

TGA - FOI 2389 - Pfizer

TGA - FOI 2389 - Pfizer

There is no data to rely upon, especially as they unblinded the placebo group ^{^009 ^010} and count all people < 2 months post Dose 2 as “Unvaccinated” or “Single Dose” – so what DATA do we have that is not a sham? Really, why is noone going mental over this? All the “Unvaccinated and Single Dose Vaccinated” data is mixed in together – so if they get “Covid” after getting a jab – how convenient that you can list them as “Unvaccinated”?

If you have heart problems, or any of the other adverse effects and the doctor thinks “safe and effective” just like the rest of the cult and doesn’t report it – then people think “Covid” caused the heart problems, etc. Where is the common sense? And noone cares because the media isn’t telling them to care lol – that’s the crazy thing – people are waiting for the TV to tell them what to care about. And Pharma don’t care because this suits them just fine – not only have they manipulated laws to give them immunity to liability – but all the stats can be tweaked in their favour and there’s no control group or legitimate statistics anywhere? The ONLY chance we have of getting some corrected statistics is via health insurance agencies – when people claim “vaccine injury” or “vaccinated” in their health rebate claims. What an insane mad world we’re in, run by absolute criminals, and blind cult media followers.

Let alone the initial trials were setup for pharma-favour, the FOI’s in the TGA are grossly revealing, the suppression of any true health advice or working treatments, the silencing of our doctors and health professionals, the umpteen hours of Australian gov’t hearings I downloaded revealing that our elected MP’s and Senators are kept out of the loop and only a select-few are privy to what goes on behind closed doors, and don’t even get me started on the PCR test – or the Great Reset, Social Credit System and all the other Agenda’s in play.

Now they are mandating it – forcing it if you want to keep your job (or your relationships) – onto the population and now giving it to babies, kids, and pregnant women!! What the hell people!! Something really off and sinister is going on and people who watch the media are kind of under some kind of spell where they can no longer think or question – just blind trust and blind cult-like worshipping of these companies who literally have no history of being the ‘good guys’.

Why are they desperate to get experimental injections into the whole population – every arm of the world at the same time? Are you not concerned at all about the ramifications of this if something is wrong with these vaccines? The whole planet with the same untested, experimental, injection? Please! This is so illogical and careless and pure insanity or evil. Where’s the common sense here, why are people lining up for this – it makes no sense – where’s their brain? But I digress… back on-topic.

“This is a post about graphene though, stop going off on your own tangent…”

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

1. They are using completely novel excipients (that means they are using ingredients that have never been used previously).
2. They created their own ‘quick & dirty‘ toxicokinetic study for these excipients (not the standard FDA guidelines), and used their own methodology to get it fast-tracked.
3. The rat studies they used, shows the excipients are getting to the liver in large quantities.
4. The reproductive tox study in rats was non-GLP compliant and 2 variants of the product (V8 and V9) were used in the study – which was a different product than the one approved by the FDA.

• Did Pfizer Do Any Safety Studies For MRNA Injections?
• EMA/FDA/MHRA Rushed Approval Of Shots W/Out Safety Data
• Australian Medical Network – Open Letter To Atagi & TGA

The Electromagnetism phenomenon in the Vaccinated (or “Graphinated“) is real. Along with myself and other friends who are “magnetized” (jabbed or not), this is a real phenomenon – where you would do best to trust your own experience other than a “fact-checker” website funded by those that don’t want you to know you are magnetized. See full post, literature, videos, and antidote:

Summary of findings so far:

• Graphene, graphene oxide, graphite composites, graphene compounds, or carbon composites
• iron oxide
• nanotech components, nano-particles
• microstructures of unknown composition
• microtechnology
• rare odd findings, such as the carbon nanoctopi & parasites
• AstraZeneca vial generates an electrical field
• diodes and transistors

EBMC squared was able to obtain four vials of injection material: One Pfizer, two Moderna and one AstraZeneca, to establish, if graphene or graphite composites were in the vials (initially fairly sure there wouldn’t be).

Moderna Microscopy

Pfizer Microscopy

See full post
“[UK Lab] What’s In The Vials? (Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca)”
for Video, Screenshots, Links, and Full Transcript

NZ – Pfizer – Dark Field Microscopy

There are 4 teams in New Zealand working on this, they post their findings at: lifeoftheblood.com (Check out: lifeoftheblood.com/nanotech-in-the-shots) (archive)

Dr. Matt Shelton

Undeclared Nanotech Components Found in COVID-19 Vaccines

• Dr. Matt Shelton: Undeclared Nanotech Components Found in COVID-19 Vaccines – Above Video (Jan 2022)

See full post:
[NZ Labs] What’s In The Vials? (Pfizer)

Pfizer Microscopy Analysis

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (Comirnaty): A microscopy analysis by Dr John B.

Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: A microscopy analysis.

3

8

Dr John B analysis of the Nanotechnological investigations on Covid-19 vaccines white paper on vaccines’ compositions anonymously uploaded by The Scientists’ Club. (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Priorix MMR, riorix-Tetra MMR+V).

Download whitepaper: MedicDebate | Google Drive

4n

9n

Analysis of vaccination vial confirms presence of graphene nanoparticles

“Well, this is TEM electron microscopy which is transmission electron microscopy. The electron microscope used is the JEM-2100Plus. Let’s start with the electron microscope. This is what appears in the vial. This is a sample photo taken from the scientific literature: That is what I want you to see. Now I’m going to put the image on the left of the vaccine sample and on the right of the graphene. And you draw your own conclusions. “

• Google Scholar search for “Jose Luis Sevillano”

Sinovac / CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, Pfizer

External analysis of AstraZeneca vaccine by biophysicist Guillermo Iturriaga

Molecular Biophysicist and Electrical Engineer Guillermo Iturriga, CEO of Laser Beam Technology Chile.

1. Detects “electrically conductive material” in the vaccinated which could be Graphene, and the magnetic effect is there when there is heat, and the magnet falls of when it cools down.
2. When he “shakes” an AstraZeneca vial it generates an electrical field.
3. Detected diodes and transistors in the AZ vial with a Fluke tester

Dr. Martín Monteverde & biotechnologists Anabela Femia and Lisandro Laferriere discover Graphene oxide & microtechnology in Cansino, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sinopharm, and Sputnik vials. Be sure to download their presentation, it’s absolutely stunning.

Loads more images in the 115-page Presentation:

In Poland, Dr. Franc Zalewski (Geologist) did a conference showing something he named “The Thing”. Corona2inspect researchers call it “Carbon nano-octopus or carbon nanoctopi ” and have discovered a similar looking ‘synthetic creature’ in other images shared by Dr. Carrie Madej, and Dr. Campra for the Fifth Column.

1. Germany – Professor Dr Arne Burkhart, German pathologist
2. UK – Dr. Philippe van Welbergen, Medical Director of Biomedical Clinics
3. South Africa – Dr Zandré Botha PhD – Live & Dry Blood Analyst
4. Australia –  Anonymous pathologists who specialise in Live Blood Analysis
5. USA? – Eunice Lieveld, Blood Researcher – undisclosed location
6. Bloodwork Studies (click title to expand)

Bloodwork of the Vaccinated (or Graphinated – everyone!) and Blood Exposure to Graphene

Professor Dr Arne Burkhart, German pathologist that was able to show some pretty strange objects in pathological examinations that have been carried out, that fitted the description of graphene.

On September 20, 2021, a group of several dozen physicians and pathologists held a day-long symposium at the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen, Germany, to try and figure out why hundreds of thousands of people have died in Europe, alone, not to mention other parts of the world, soon after getting a Covid-19 vaccine shot.

This was followed by a session titled, “Undeclared Components of Covid-19 Vaccines.” Here they examined and discussed a host of non-biological components they found to a lesser or greater extent in the blood of vaccinated people. It appears that all the vaccines administered in Germany and Austria contained these non-biological objects – Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and AstraZeneca. ^{^015}

• Professor Dr. Arne Burkhardt (Pathologist)
• German Pathology Conference
• Austrian Research Group presents it’s findings of Undeclared Components in Pfizer
  • Full 3Hr presentation at the Pathology Conference (Odysee)
  • 30 Min presentation to the CoronaCommittee (BitChute)

Dr. Philippe van Welbergen, Medical Director of Biomedical Clinics, explained that when his patients started complaining about chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory issues, even sometimes paralysis and late onset of heavy menstruation (women in their 60s upwards), he took blood samples.

Their blood had unusual tube-like structures, some particles which lit up and many damaged cells. Few healthy cells were visible. Until three months earlier, he had never seen these formations in blood. He’s also discovered graphene and he shows evidence of shedding.

14 images below – go to Full Post for 56 images

Gigantic Graphene Oxide

Graphene Tube - not a single healthy cell - "thrombus"

Without the corresponding validating evidence/documents that us truth-seekers need:

Dr Zandré Botha PhD – South Africa – Certified Live & Dry Blood Analyst of 15 years says she’s never seen anything like this and doesn’t know what she’s seeing but is sharing what she is seeing in the bloodwork of her vaccinated patients and in a Johnson & Johnson vial, to get answers.

Pre-Vaccine Bloodwork

Post-Vaccinated Bloodwork

• The “discs” could be Docetaxel as per Patent US 2010/0216804 A1 ^{^016 ^017 ^018}

A group of Australian pathologists who specialise in Live Blood Analysis using dark field and phase microscopy have documented anomalies that have arisen since the vaccine rollout began in 2021. Blood samples now routinely exhibit severe rouleaux formations (stacking and clotting together). None of these structures have previously been seen or reported in the last 35 years of live blood analysis worldwide.

This one doesn’t have the corresponding validating evidence/documents that us truth-seekers need but it does have the same images as those who have verified references, the only difference being is that she also found lots of parasites & bacteria.

1. Graphene oxide in contact with blood – Analysis ^{^019 ^020}
2. Identification of patterns in blood of vaccinated persons: microswimmers ^{^021}
3. Identification of patterns in blood of vaccinated people: crystallized graphene ^{^022}
4. Blood exposure to graphene oxide can cause anaphylactic death in non-human primates ^{^023}
5. Identification of patterns in blood of vaccinated people: GQD graphene quantum dots ^{^024}
6. Wireless Nanocommunication Networks for Nanotechnology in the Human Body ^{^025}
7. Electromagnetic Nano-Networks Software ^{^026}
8. The CORONA routing system for nano-networks ^{^027}
9. Identification of patterns in coronavirus vaccines: carbon-graphene nanooctopuses and nanotubes  ^{^028}
10. Identification of patterns in coronaviruss vaccines: Mesoporous spheres ^{^029}
11. Identification of patterns in blood of vaccinated persons: Non-uniform multilayer graphene patches or graphene cracks ^{^030}
    

• Life of the Blood (International/New Zealand) https://lifeoftheblood.com/

Graphene oxide is detected in the body by specialized cells of the immune system causing the same symptoms as COVID-19

Second, according to the Spanish researchers, Graphene Oxide Causes Loss of Taste, Smell, “Covid” Symptoms and can account for all the severe-symptoms that some experience:

• Graphene oxide inside the body causes:
  • thrombogenicity, thrombi.
  • blood clotting.
  • post inflammatory syndrome or systemic or multi-organ inflammations.
• Graphene oxide inside the body when it is above the levels of glutathione —which is the body’s natural reserve of antioxidants causes:
  • alteration of the immune system
  • collapse of the immune system 
  • cytokine storm.
• Inhaled graphene oxide spreads evenly throughout the alveolar tract and causes:
  • bilateral pneumonias.
  • inflammation of the mucous membranes and thus
    • loss of taste and smell, possible loss of taste and smell: anosmia.

In short, graphene oxide behaves exactly like the supposed SARS-CoV-2 of the official version, generating the same symptomatology of severe COVID-19.

When installed at the neuronal level, it causes neurodegeneration or, in other words, neurological COVID-19.

This large study covers most of the above, showing the toxicity of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles and how it effects us. ^{^031}

Nutshell: “it’s toxic to everything!”.

Several of the lab-analysis below believe COVID-19 itself is caused by Chemical & Radiation Poisoning because of Graphene (either Reduced Graphene Oxide or Graphene Hydroxide).

Dr Andreas Noack

A German research chemist Dr Andreas Noack (did his PhD on Graphene & worked for leading manufacturer of carbon nanoparticles) published his graphene hydroxide video on Nov 23, 2021 and 20-30 minutes after the interview, suffered a sudden ‘invisible’ torturous attack and died on Nov 26, 2021.

Earlier videos and a PDF he created (on his widow’s telegram channel) suggest that he predicted he would be taken out, was expecting and at peace with it except that he hoped to get out the information that he wanted to get out before it happened. Browsing through his past videos on his wife’s channel, suggests to me that he was on a mission, that humanity and integrity came first.

In response to the Pablo Campra Micro-Raman Spectroscopy paper “Detection Of Graphene In Covid19 Vaccines” ^{^045} he stated that Graphene hydroxide (not Graphene Oxide) was found in all the vaccines studied and that they act like microscopic razor blades in the blood stream that can cut the blood vessels. He said they do not decompose and the longer they are in the bloodstream, the more damage will be done over time, and it destroys your heart. He also said the reason the athletes are dropping dead is because they have fast-flowing blood (the faster the blood flows, the more damage the razors do). And he said the epithel cells are extremely smooth for good reason but because rough when cut up with these razor blades and then things stick to it.

See full post, including a full transcript of the main video that ended his life.

Dr. Andreas Noack & Graphene Hydroxide

• He was a Carbon Chemist “Andreas Noack Studierte at the TU Darmstadt Chemie und PhD 1995 über ein Thema aus dem Bereich der heterogenisierten Catalysis. Danach works for the Chemviron Carbon/Calgon Carbon in Business Development.“
• Patent Search for “Andreas Noack” (69 Results)
• Pubmed Search for “Andreas Noack” (19 Results)

See also: A 2016 paper “Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms” – Page 14 states “Furthermore, the sharpened edges of GNS may act as ‘blades’, inserting and cutting through bacterial cell membranes“. ^{^046 ^047}

Looking at the TGA site – they say they test each batch but try and find more than the “promise” to do so. Try and find the results, the testing methods, it’s non-existent (or tell me where it is – I spent a few hours searching and couldn’t locate any proof that they test each batch, but last year when I looked, I found batch reports (which I can’t find now but hope I have screenshotted and downloaded somewhere) of the list of batches they tested and the comment next to most of them was that they don’t “re-test” when new lots arrive with the same pre-tested numbers on them – preferring to trust the manufacture at their word).

This is a problem because:

1. ) Toxic Batches are common:
   1. every 200th batch is Statistically-Toxic in some countries – across all brands – so “something” has changed – “something” is different once in every 200 batches – are they experimenting with different formulas, is it a particular country, why is this happening?
   2. NZ has identified toxic batches coming from Spain
   3. Japan had 1.6 million doses of Moderna recalled with contamination of ‘stainless steel’ and ‘white floating matter’ and ‘black particles‘ and ‘unidentified pink substances‘ (they’ve had 4 separate recalls the last time I looked it up)
   4. There is a website tracking bad batches by one of the good guys here.
2. ) This is a Global Experiment:
   1. They are mix-matching different brands “on a whim” with no long-term safety data or public disclosure of what ‘really is in the vials and what they can do to the genome’ – why the hell people are signing up for multiple different brands is beyond reason, people are truly brain-washed to think this is a safe thing to do – what the hell people, what the hell.
   2. They aren’t your standard run-of-the-mill ‘vaccines’ – they are gene-editing drugs ^{^048} – that were re-labelled / branded “vaccines” so that they could ride the tails of the vaccine-debate and all the literature and media-messages and promotions that pharma & WHO have invested so deeply into already, so that you could have a “science-denier” narrative in your marketing campaign – but calling it a vaccine is just a con-job – it really is. You are conning people into experimenting with your hoo-ha. Whenever you admit to doing it, the media won’t share those bits, so the public is so mortifyingly misinformed about what these things are, that it’s absolutely beyond criminal now – we’re now talking either deliberate or “just-following-orders-policy-driven” democide.
   3. A universal enforced flu shot was planned. I mean – just that alone should’ve raised alarm bells.
   4. The “vaccines” are designed from a computer upload from Wuhan. You are injecting people with a vial containing ingredients designed from the very place accused of releasing a bioweapon.
   5. The positive-test for the virus only exists as a result of a paper by a corrupt company who manufactures the tests and it was approved by WHO “the next day” after it was submitted, and globally we immediately started to use the test even though “the science says” it cannot be used as per that publication. And all of this makes sense if you’ve read all the tabletop exercises which unfortunately I’ve had the displeasure of inflicting my mind to. See tabletop exercises. The fact that they have used this test for everything to do with these vaccines, to show they work – means that even their “science” is fuckery. Absolute fuckery.
   6. Oh my god, I’m having a day. I’ll skip this section for now before I go on more of a tangent. See also: PCR-Tests posts.

Point is – it’s very suspicious that they wouldn’t test every single batch from known-criminal companies with new experimental technology at warp-speed.

Charles Lieber has 66 patents which are being used as scaffolds and wires and nanosensors and semiconductors in all vaccines as described here. ^{^049}

At the beginning of the pandemic if you remember, Charles Lieber, a Harvard nanotechnology researcher with decades of experience, was indicted by the DOJ for fraud in collaboration with the Wuhan University of Technology.  ^{^050}

Charles Lieber received millions of dollars in grant money from the US Department of Defence, specifically the military think tanks DARPA, AFOSR, and ONR, as well as NIH and MITRE. His specialty is the use of silicon nanowires in lieu of patch clamp electrodes to monitor and modulate intracellular activity, something he has been working on at Harvard for the past twenty years.

He was claimed to have been working on silicon nanowire batteries in China, but none of his colleagues can recall him ever having worked on battery technology in his life; all of his research deals with bionanotechnology, or the blending of nanotech with living cells.

Charles Lieber’s own papers describe the use of silicon nanowires for brain-computer interfaces, or “neural lace” technology. His papers describe how neurons can endocytose whole silicon nanowires or parts of them, monitoring and even modulating neuronal activity.

Charles Lieber was a colleague of Robert Langer (an expert in nanotech drug delivery) and who is one of the co-founders of Moderna.

Both Charles Lieber and Robert Langer’s bibliographies describe, essentially, techniques for human enhancement, i.e. transhumanism.

Charles Lieber has worked for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, and according to the press-release video above, was paid one and a half million dollars to setup a research lab in Wuhan, China, at the same time as receiving research grants from Harvard & NIH. ^{^051}

One of his Patents is for Nanobots (‘nanoscale devices’) with “ballistic transport” for which “carriers can be injected” that can include metal electrodes including nickel, gold, silver, copper, zinc, cadmium, iron, nickel, cobalt, aluminum, chromium, platinum, tungsten, or the like. It also gives an example that ‘an electrode or other device may be in electrical communication with both the nanoscale wire and the non-nanoscale electrical contact, where the junctions between such components are not Schottky barriers’ (energy barriers for electrons). The invention includes a method for preparing nanostructures. And that nanoscale wires can be “grown” using chemical vapor depositions and that the nanoscale wires can also be “doped” by introducing the doping element into the vapor phase reactant, and more… read the patent here:

• Patent US 7,858,965 – Nanowire Heterostructures ^{^052}

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

NIH-funded Nanotechnology Patents has Charles Lieber’s name all over them.

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

Patents by Rockefeller University (I haven’t done a search for this yet to see how many there are – I suspect hundreds – I randomly came across this one today which I thought I’d note):

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

Anthony Fauci, NIH / NIAID, Gain of Function (Bioweapon) Research, massive amounts of conflict$ with all the pharma arms and blah blah blah – just like Gates, Fauci’s hands are all over everything to do with this pandemic.

I know I have a few PDFs somewhere full of the patents, so don’t think this is a full list, this is just a “I have this page open so I’m noting it” – but the Fauci/COVID Dossier is one of them that I can list right now.

The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08, issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. ^{^053}

As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit. (Source: U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/206,537, filed May 21, 2000) In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full-length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.

• Download: The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier (PDF) ^{^054}
• Read: Following The Patents: Covid-19 & Medical Tyranny (6 Feb 2022) ^{^055}
• See My Pandemic Timeline for when I started noting down all the Bioweapon / Fauci connections

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

I have much more on DARPA’s investments in remote-controlling humans in another post (that is still in draft-mode).

DARPA’s ElectRx program (Electric Prescriptions) is funding research into tiny embedded devices that can monitor conditions inside the body and stimulate particular nerves in response, “enhancing the body’s self-healing abilities”. DARPA is examining health on a nano scale through its electrical prescriptions (ElectRx) program. ^{^056 ^057}

• “Imagine a device far tinier, that could be delivered through a needle. This device could be designed to constantly monitor certain conditions in the body, and then directly stimulate certain nerve pathways to trigger the body’s correct response mechanism when it’s not working as it should be. Let’s say blood sugar regulation isn’t working properly in a diabetic – this technology could potentially detect a blood sugar level anomaly and trigger the pancreas to release glucagon or insulin to sort it out”.
• As tiny as a single nerve fibre, an ElectRx device would sit in the body monitoring the bloodstream or electrical environment for a particular signal, at which point it would stimulate a targeted nerve in order to produce a desired outcome. The possibilities are incredibly broad, both good and bad.

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

Karen Kingston – former Pfizer employee and biotech analyst.

Karen Kingston is a Biotech Analyst and yet another former Pfizer employee who is speaking out. She began her career as a Pfizer sales rep in NYC. She’s a pharmaceutical and medical device business analyst over 20 years of experience in business development, marketing, sales, public speaking, and strategic consulting. As an executive strategist, her clients range from start-ups to Fortune 500 leaders, including Allergan, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and Thermo Fisher Scientific.

Evidence of Graphene Oxide in EUA ‘VACCINES‘ (Moderna and Pfizer)
August, 2021 (Powerpoint Presentation)

Suspicious Patents under the guise of Health & ‘VACCINES”
Totalitarian Vaccine/Social Credit System Patents & Mandatory Apps
October, 2021 (Powerpoint Presentation)

Vaccine patents that detail the evil intent
October, 2021 (PDF Presentation | Video) ^{^017}

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents and her video presentation to the “Patents” post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

Pfizer Whistleblowers

• Melissa McAtee Confirms Graphene Oxide Coverup in Internal Pfizer Emails, the Covid Vaccines GLOW when there’s a dark background, the cover-up of aborted foetal cell lines, & details the corruption inside the Vaccine Manufacturing plant (Feb 2022)
• Chris Croce, Pfizer Senior Associate Scientist (Hidden camera) admits he feels like he works for an evil corporation – that it’s all about money – and that natural immunity is better.
• Rahul Khandke, Pfizer Scientist (Hidden camera) admits Pfizer staff are bred to be vaccine-advocates with endless seminars and constantly told you can’t talk to the public. He also shares that your antibodies are probably better than vaccination.
• Former Chief Scientist and Vice-President of Pfizer Respiratory & Allergy Research, Dr. Michael Yeadon says there is Clear Evidence of Fraud in the Pfizer study, explains how they exaggerated risks, explains variants and viruses, warns of Vaccine passports and the end of human freedoms.

See the “Former Pfizer Staff Speak Out” post.

A whistleblower from Ventavia (clinical trial director in charge of one of the Pfizer trials) blew the whistle on the data integrity issues in the Pfizer trial via the British Medical Journal. She’s now suing them.

1. Graphene oxide disrupts mitochondrial homeostasis – Analysis ^{^058 ^059}
2. Graphene oxide quantum dot-based memristors – Analysis ^{^060 ^061}
3. Graphene oxide can adsorb and absorb CO2 ^{^062}
4. The spintronics of graphene Has Pandora’s box been uncovered here?  ^{^063}

Graphene & the Brain

1. Interaction of graphene oxide with brain cells – Analysis ^{^067 ^068 ^069}
2. Graphene nanoparticles targeting siRNA delivery in the brain – Analysis ^{^070 ^071}
3. Graphene oxide is able to overcome the blood-brain barrier and directly affect the brain- Analysis ^{^072 ^073 ^074 ^075 ^076 ^077 ^078 ^079 ^068 ^080}
4. Neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases caused by graphene oxide – Analysis “graphene oxide affects the normal functioning of the immune system, causing it to be inhibited or not function properly.” ^{^081 ^082 ^083 ^084}

Graphene & Mind Control

1. Graphene oxide and brain stimulation by electromagnetic waves EM capable of inferring in the human mind – Analysis “a person inoculated with graphene oxide would have nanotransducers that they could penetrate the BBB blood-brain barrier and act according to the signals emitted by electromagnetic waves, to infer the mechanisms of conditional behavior, similar to those described in Pavlov’s experiment.” “non-genetic remote optical modulation of neuronal activity, by means of diffuse graphene nanostructures.” “RF radiofrequency waves “activate the ferritin -tagged channels through a biochemical pathway,” which increases free iron levels. This could explain the magnetic effects.” ^{^085 ^086 ^087 ^088 ^089 ^090 ^091 ^092 ^073 ^093 ^094 ^095 ^096 ^097}
2. GRAPHENE is a superconductive and highly integrative with neuron cells in the brain. Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells – Frontiers Neuorsci, Apr 2018 ^{^098}
3. The molecules of GRAPHENE can interact with neurons in the brain in a remote mode using different radio-frequencies (5G could be one of these) , they can map the brain and transmit and receive INSTRUCTIONS remotely. Magnetogentics ^{^099}

Possibly Related (no Graphene mentioned)

• Engineering Brain Parasites for Intracellular Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins – 2018 ^{^100}

Self-Assembling Nanotubes with Electric Fields

1. European Parliament
2. Australian Parliament
3. Fact-Checkers (the marketing-arm of Pharma and invited guests to DAVOS and on the boards of WEF, Pfizer, in addition to receiving financing from Gates, Governments, and the like, so nothing they say can be trusted – they are being used as a weapon in this war – the most intelligent idea our psychotic globalists came up with)

European Parliament

“Time for the truth on the presence of graphene in the COVID-19 vaccines”

Response:

Translation: “We looked at the reports, but we’re going to trust the manufacturers word and not look into it further… no independent lab analysis from the government needed… plus we’ve invested over a billion Euro into our Graphene goldmine, let alone these vaccines contracts…

(oh my god– this bit!..)

Graphene oxide is not used in the manufacture or formulation of any of the COVID-19 vaccines or other medicines, so it would not be present at manufacturing facilities and there is no obvious way that it could get into the vaccines”

— Notice the clever wordsmithing? It’s not stating that Graphene isn’t in it.. what a clever fox you are, little Ms Deceiver of Humanity / Pharmaceutical Puppet.

I would also suggest to Sergio, re-ask your question using the terminology “graphene or any derivatives” – because looking at her answer, she is saying “no to graphene”, but there are so many derivatives of graphene that come under different names, that she may be doing a little by-pass there as well.

The yellow above is just such interesting wording. So “graphene oxide” is not used in the manufacture/formulation thereby no obvious way it could get into the vaccines. That is not the same thing as saying “there is no graphene oxide in the vaccines”, just saying “there’s no obvious way”. Since graphene oxide and graphene-derivates of all sorts are used in everything now, including machinery, including water, including that saline-graphene patent we already mentioned, including clothing – her answer is not good enough. There is a lot of reasons to suspect there is this or something like this in the vials and saying ‘there is no obvious way” is literally a mind-game / trick / voodoo / clever copywriting.

• See also:
• The European Union invested one billion euros in a project called The Graphene Flagship
  “Europe Has Invested €1 Billion Into Graphene—But For What? Six years into an ambitious 10-year research project, experts weigh in on whether the Graphene Flagship can help the “wonder material” make it through the Valley of Death” – June 2019

Australian Parliament

“Verify whether Covid-19 vaccines contain Graphene Oxide”

Response:

(Should people in our governments wear their sponsorship badges like the athletes do, so that we know where there loyalties really lie when they are giving a response?)

Greg Hunt - Australian Health Minister

Dear Chair

I refer to your correspondence of 18 October 2021 concerning EN3128 requesting the disclosure of the COVID-19 vaccine ingredients.

The safety of the Australian population has always been the highest priority of the Australian Government. For this reason, decisions regarding COVID-19 vaccines have been guided by the expert medical advice of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI).

The Government is working closely with the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the ATAGI and all state and territory health departments to ensure that monitoring of COVID-19 vaccine safety is of the highest possible standard in Australia.

The TGA formally assesses the safety, quality and efficacy of medicines, including vaccines, prior to their approval for use in Australia. All vaccines must pass the TGA’s rigorous assessment and approval processes, after being tested in large clinical trials on thousands of people. Technical experts analyse the three phases of clinical trials test for safety at every phase, as well as how effective the vaccine is at protecting against infection and/or disease.

All COVID-19 vaccines used in the rollout have been granted provisional approval following a complete assessment of all this available data. No part of the process has been rushed and the TGA does not have an ‘Emergency Use Authorisation’ pathway for COVID-19 vaccines.

The TGA is open and transparent about safety information relating to COVID-19 vaccines, including any suspected side effects or potential safety issues. The TGA publishes a weekly safety report, including information about reported suspected side effects, as well as other safety alerts as required. More information can be found at: www.tga.gov.au using the search terms ‘COVID-19-vaccine safety monitoring and reporting’.

Although graphene oxide may serve as a potential vaccine carrier to help activate immunity, none of the COVID-19 vaccines approved and in use in Australia include graphene oxide.

The AstraZeneca (Vaxzevria), Pfizer, and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine Product Information (PI) leaflets are publicly available on the TGA website, listing the ingredients in each vaccine. The PIs are required as supporting documents for regulatory approval. None of the PI’s for these vaccines list graphene oxide as an ingredient and is therefore not present.

The goal is to protect all people in Australia from the harm caused COVID-19 infection, through preventing serious illness and death, and where possible, disease transmission. The Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines have all been proven through approval and safety monitoring processes to be very effective at reducing severe illness, hospitalisation and death.

From 1 October 2021, all Australians aged 12 years and over are now eligible to receive a COVID 19 vaccine. Australians aged 60 years and over are now eligible to receive a Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, while those aged 18 years or over can choose to have the AstraZeneca vaccine after providing informed consent.

It is important for Australians to have access to credible and timely information about COVID-19 vaccines. It is a large and complex project, and the information you are seeking may change over time- that is why we strongly encourage all Australians stay up-to-date on all news and announcements, by regularly checking my Department’s website at: www.health.gov.au.

Vaccination remains the most effective way for people to protect themselves from the effects of COVID-19. The Government encourages everyone to be vaccinated as soon as they are eligible.

Thank you for writing on this matter.

Yours sincerely

from the Minister for Health and Aged Care, Mr Hunt

Translation: Our “Health” Committees are hired on the Sustainable Development / NWO / Great Reset agenda and our government is just a front for the UN (& Australia was sold-out decades ago), therefore we’re going to continue to lie to the people and give them the illusion there is someone actually giving a shit about their health, when we really don’t care – and “I am the Minister for Health with no Health expertize – but I did work for the World Economic Forum as the Director of Strategy and I am the sole person in charge of an Unlimited Budget for the COVID pandemic “vaccines”, which I’ve used to pretty much funnel billions to Globalist-Shareholders and crush Australian small businesses, industries, and families. In the meantime, please don’t see if there’s any connections in my family to Graphene.. and P.S. I’m retiring in a moment…”

This line irks me… The goal is to protect all people in Australia from the harm caused COVID-19 infection, through preventing serious illness and death, and where possible, disease transmission. If you weren’t Evil-in-Disguise, the goal would be to protect all people from harm. Not ’caused by COVID infection’ because the ‘infection’ is whatever poison you are somehow exposing us to. These shots don’t stop transmission, and they don’t prevent serious illness or death. #canteven

See also:

• Australia Conflict$ of Interest Video and browse the Conflicts of Interest posts or to see who is behind Australia’s “health” (Health?) “harm” agenda.
• “Australia’s First Commercial Graphene Plant” “The plant will produce up to 10 tonnes of graphene per year. Two tonnes of the graphene in the first year will be for products and customers in the Australian manufacturing sector.” – Eco Investor May 2016
• Muse over: Health Minister Hunt’s Family Involvement in Graphene and Vaxines (I haven’t been able to verify this)
• Young Global Leaders (WEF) – starring Greg Hunt.
• The Great Reset is Real

The “Fact Checkers”

A Snopes.com fact-check (propaganda-narrative-upholder) on Karen Kingston’s “Graphene is in the Vaccines” video, refers to “Reuters” (another “propaganda-narrative-upholder” fact-checker) throughout and says:

“Graphene oxide is not included in the ingredient lists of any filings for either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. Speaking to Reuters, Pfizer’s senior associate of global media relations said that, “Graphene oxide is not used in the manufacture of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.” Arguments suggesting that they do, therefore, rest on “independent research” that purports to have uncovered nefarious secrets by scouring the internet for hints.“

Well to you I call… “Bull. Shit”.

1. Frankly, we can’t believe a word that Reuters says about Pfizer, because of the Pfizer Director and Reuters President & CEO (and WEF Co-Chair Int’l biz advisory) connection.
2. “Graphene oxide is not included in the ingredient lists of any filings” – So what? They show 2 different formulations in their toxicity studies – that they submitted for FDA approval – even though it was a 3rd formula – a different “variation” of the product that got “approved” lol.. so I say, “so what” – their trial was a fraud, their submissions to FDA were a fraud, and they are lying about their formulations. So if an ingredient isn’t listed on a filing, how the hell can that be “proof” when they lied about everything else and they are the most corrupt industry on the planet with a history of convicted fraud dating back decades?
3. They linked to a “Reuters fact-check” titled Fact Check-COVID-19 vaccines do not contain graphene oxide which stated this as it’s proof:

“Pfizer told Reuters its vaccines do not contain the material.”.

You can’t make this up but apparently that’s all the public needs as proof these days – actually they don’t even read the articles anymore, they just see that something has been “Fact-Checked” and that’s good enough for them. These guys get paid, what, like 40 grand per article and the best evidence they can come up with is “Pfizer told us” – which obviously means absolutely nothing since they are pretty much “working for Pfizer”.

The phrase in the Snopes fact-check: “Graphene oxide is not used in the manufacture” is not a denial of Graphene in the vaccines. It’s just clever copy-writing that is good-enough to fool the masses. There are many formulations of Graphene-based derivatives and there’s no “standardization” for graphene-oxide formulas, and Pfizer’s own IP has 280 secret ingredients. Release those details and you might be able to fact-check, in the meantime, you are just another fraudulent fake-news pusher hiding behind the clever-deceptive-marketing use of the words “fact-checker”.

I’m not going to fact-check-the-fact-checkers’ entire article because I want to move onto another topic tonight, but to address this business with the “colouring” of Graphene… they wrote:

“Even more problematic for those who claim that graphene oxide has been added to mRNA vaccines is the coloring. These vaccines are clear to mildly cloudy, but as highlighted by Reuter’s, Matthew Diasio, an American Chemical Society Congressional Science & Engineering fellow, stated that a sample that contained even 1% of graphene oxide would look dark if not black.“

• Again they refer to “Reuters” as their source, which we cannot trust.
• And how is that a “source” anyway? lol – seriously? Fraudulent fact-checkers referring to another fraudulent fact-checker as their “evidence”? Where’s the images of the vials as proof, or the studies showing what you claim, or any link to “something” – an interview with an actual person who works in the “manufacturing” of the vaccines – anything more credible other than ‘a person working for another fact-checker – the same one hired for Pfizer’s global messaging, of which both had the same bosses for years’ (Pfizer Director and Reuters CEO & President) , “says” that it would be black? How do people not pick this up?

Took me 2 seconds to find this one (although I’d have to pay EURO $42 for the whole publication which I’m not going to do) which mentions directly in the abstract “The resultant Fe₃O₄/rGO sheets were demonstrated to possess interesting magnetic and electrochemical properties attractive for a large variety of potential applications.” ^{^107} Fullsize image was found in another publication (see Figure 20), which mentioned “Increasing the Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles on the surface of the graphene sheet was found to decrease the adsorption capacity, while the magnetization increased.” and you can see the magnet sticking to the “transparent-looking” vial. ^{^108}

Another image found from a publication (PMC3715233) showed the Graphene-Oxide tested was transparent-amber in colour (AstraZeneca is the same shade) – see Figure 1, first vial A which has 0.45 mg graphene-oxide (the comparison vials B-F have added gold nanoparticles solutions of differing concentrations). ^{^109}

PMID: 21952144

PMC3715233

The researchers at CMU working on ‘remote controlling heart cells and brain neurons‘ – funded by DARPA & NIH – say:

“Graphene is nearly 200 times stronger than steel, flexible, nearly transparent and highly conductive. Since graphene is a single layer of carbon atoms connected in a hexagonal pattern, it is thin and lightweight, making it attractive for nanotechnology applications such as building nanodevices for biomedical applications. Graphene’s ability to store electric charges is attracting the attention of technologies. This feature is largely derived from graphene’s high amount of surface area relative to its volume.“  ^{^110}

The following publications directly elude to graphene-related materials being used because of their “optical transparency“

• “…graphene has been considered as a viable substitute for indium tin oxide (ITO) due to its optical transparency, excellent electrical conductivity, and chemical stability.” PMC6356588 ^{^111}
• “Graphene, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide have been widely considered as promising candidates for industrial and biomedical applications due to their exceptionally high mechanical stiffness and strength, excellent electrical conductivity, high optical transparency, and good biocompatibility.” PMC6274822 ^{^112}
• “Here, graphene’s role is studied as an electromagnetically transparent electrode in a piezoelectric graphene respiratory sensor (GRS) device… “ PMID: 32965091 ^{^113}

Etc. etc. I’m not inferring any of the above is in the vaccines, (that’s what we’re trying to figure out because they aren’t telling us what’s in the damn vials!)… I am saying there is 161 pages of research – over 1,600 articles on pubmed that contains “graphene transparent” in the abstract, and that you haven’t fact-checked anything because even my ‘random pick of the first 3 articles on pubmed – without even knowing what their concentrations are – is more believable than a “guy at Reuters/Pfizer says the vial would be black“.

• Adjuvants in vaccines
• Sensor Pills / Health Monitoring / Compliance Pills
• Clothes, Masks, and Medical Equipment
• Agriculture and Food
• Organic Waste
• Food-Packaging
• Food-Stamping
• Lactose-free Dairy Products
• Chicken
• Water
• Geoengineering & Aviation Fuel
• Dust

Graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for ‘robust stimulation of cellular immunity‘

• Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity Xu et al., Nanoscale, 2016,8, 3785-3795 ^{^114}
• “Functionalized graphene oxides (FGOs) show great potential as vaccine vectors and adjuvants. The combination of antigen and FGOs as vaccine formulation is a promising and important strategy for immunotherapy of various diseases.” ScienceDirect ^{^115}
• Dr John B Summary from “Nanotechnological investigations on COVID-19 Vaccines” white paper. “Multiple particles of different elemental composition were found in the CovidVaccine samples. Some of them could be cadmium selenide quantum dots, graphene or metallic particles made from stainless steel. They should not be present in the vaccine.“

• Graphene-Based Sensors for Human Health Monitoring ^{^116}

Abstract: Since the desire for real-time human health monitoring as well as seamless human-machine interaction is increasing rapidly, plenty of research efforts have been made to investigate wearable sensors and implantable devices in recent years. As a novel 2D material, graphene has aroused a boom in the field of sensor research around the world due to its advantages in mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. Numerous graphene-based sensors used for human health monitoring have been reported, including wearable sensors, as well as implantable devices, which can realize the real-time measurement of body temperature, heart rate, pulse oxygenation, respiration rate, blood pressure, blood glucose, electrocardiogram signal, electromyogram signal, and electroencephalograph signal, etc. Herein, as a review of the latest graphene-based sensors for health monitoring, their novel structures, sensing mechanisms, technological innovations, components for sensor systems and potential challenges will be discussed and outlined.

PMCID: PMC6580932

• Flexible and Stretchable Physical Sensor Integrated Platforms for Wearable Human-Activity Monitoring and Personal Healthcare ^{^117}
• 3D-Printed Graphene/Polydimethylsiloxane Composites for Stretchable and Strain-Insensitive Temperature Sensors ^{^118}
• (Heart-Monitor) A Wearable and Highly Sensitive Graphene Strain Sensor for Precise Home-Based Pulse Wave Monitoring ^{^119}
• Highly Elastic Graphene-Based Electronics Toward Electronic Skin ^{^120}
• Three dimensional graphene scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering and in-situ electrical recording ^{^121}
• (Glucose Monitoring) A flexible enzyme-electrode sensor with cylindrical working electrode modified with a 3D nanostructure for implantable continuous glucose monitoring ^{^122}
• Flexible, Highly Sensitive, and Wearable Pressure and Strain Sensors with Graphene Porous Network Structure ^{^123}
• Highly stretchable strain sensors with reduced graphene oxide sensing liquids for wearable electronics ^{^124}
• (Bodily Motion-Sensors) Sensitive, high-strain, high-rate bodily motion sensors based on graphene-rubber composites ^{^125}
• Epidermis Microstructure Inspired Graphene Pressure Sensor with Random Distributed Spinosum for High Sensitivity and Large Linearity ^{^126}
• (Brain) Considerations for Safe Innovation: The Case of Graphene ^{^127}
• (Eyes) Wearable smart sensor systems integrated on soft contact lenses for wireless ocular diagnostics ^{^128}
• The rise of plastic bioelectronics ^{^129}

• The Perspective on Bio-Nano Interface Technology for Covid-19 ^{^130}

Abstract: The field of bio-nano interfaces paves the way for a better understanding, development, and implementation of the advanced biotechnological process. Interfacing biomolecules with the nanomaterials will result in the development of new tools and techniques that, in turn, will enable to explore the fundamental process at the nano level and fabricate cost-effective portable devices. Fascinating biomolecules like DNA, RNA and proteins in the regime of nanoscale are intelligent materials that are capable of storing the information and controlling the basic structure and function of the complex biological systems. Following this concept, the current pandemic situation would be a natural selection process, where the selective pressure is on the ssRNA of Covid-19 to choose the suitable progeny for survival. Consequently, the interaction of human DNA invoking response with Covid-19 happens at the nanoscale and it could be a better candidate to provoke combat against the virus. The extent of this interaction would give us the insights at the nanotechnological level to tackle the prevention, diagnosis and treatment for Covid-19. Herein, the possible features and obstacles in Covid-19 and a probable solution from the advent of nanotechnology are discussed to address the current necessity. Moreover, the perspective sustainable green graph mask that can be prepared using green plant extract/graphene (Bio-Nano composite mask) is suggested for the possible protection of virus-like Covid-19. The composite material will not only effectively trap the virus but also inactivate the virus due to the presence of antiviral compounds in the plant extracts.

Graphene in Clothes, Masks, & Other Equipment

1. Graphene-based materials to combat COVID-19 – Analysis ^{^131 ^132}
2. Clothes with graphene oxide – Analysis ^{^133}
3. All inkjet-printed graphene-based conductive patterns for wearable e-textile applications ^{^134}

Researchers have been studying the potential negative impacts of inhaling microscopic graphene on mammals. In one 2016 experiment, mice with graphene placed in their lungs experienced localized lung tissue damage, inflammation, formation of granulomas (where the body tries to wall off the graphene), and persistent lung injury, similar to what occurs when humans inhale asbestos. A different study from 2013 found that when human cells were bound to graphene, the cells were damaged.

In order to mimic human lungs, scientists have developed biological models designed to simulate the impact of high concentration aerosolized graphene—graphene in the form of a fine spray or suspension in air—on industrial workers. One such study published in March 2020 found that a lifetime of industrial exposure to graphene induced inflammation and weakened the simulated lungs’ protective barrier.

A study from 2016 found that a small portion of aerosolized graphene nanoparticles could move down a simulated mouth and nose passages and penetrate into the lungs. A 2018 study found that brief exposure to a lower amount of aerosolized graphene did not notably damage lung cells in a model.

Read full article “Graphene-coated face masks: COVID-19 miracle or another health risk?” May 5, 2021 ^{^135}

News Articles:

• Canada Issues Recall for Graphene Masks Amid Health Concerns – Apr 5, 2021
• Recall: Graphene face masks – Public advisory – Government of Canada “Health Canada has authorized the sale of additional face mask containing graphene” – Sept 28, 2021
• Warnings Over Masks That Contain Graphene – April 16, 2021 “The Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products and the Professional Union of the Ertzaintza (SiPE) has requested the immediate withdrawal of the FFP2 masks because of the pulmonary risks due to graphene being found present.”
• French hospitals told to suspend use of facemasks containing graphene – June 6, 2021
• What we are breathing through our mouth and nose is actually hazardous waste’: Scientists find evidence of toxic chemicals in some face masks – UK – (chemical cocktail) – DailyMail
• Europe’s problem with toxic masks: ‘Does von der Leyen even know what she has been inhaling? – April 23, 2021 – The Brussels Times “Weeks after they were banned in Canada for containing dangerous nanoparticles that caused respiratory problems in schoolchildren, allegedly toxic face masks have flooded the European market and are even being worn by top EU officials.” ““It has wonderful electromagnetic properties, which is why it’s used in a lot of electronics,” explained Azoulay. “Graphene comes in the form of thin flakes which have very jagged edges. Because it is so thin – just one atom thick – it can serve a role as a sort of molecular knife, slicing through biological membranes it comes into contact with.”
• Australia seizes faulty coronavirus protective equipment imported from China – April, 2020 – ABC “The ABC has learnt that in recent weeks, Australian Border Force (ABF) officers have intercepted several deliveries of personal protective equipment (PPE) that have been found to be counterfeit or otherwise faulty.” “One law enforcement official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, estimated the ABF had already seized 800,000 masks with a combined value of more than $1.2 million on the Australian market.” “Thousands of testing kits and medical masks are below standard or defective, according to authorities in Spain, Turkey and the Netherlands.”

Articles/Rants:

• Jon Rappoport, Graphene face masks dangerous; and we’re living in a graphene world – July, 2021

If you do a search, you’ll find there’s thousands of papers and products and information about this – been there for years and we just never looked, and now it’s everywhere. Even Richard Branson is excited about putting graphene in the airplanes “because it’s lighter and it will be good for climate change“. We’re at a point in time now where people are more excited about and fixated on the benefits of graphene, than concerning ourselves with any pesky harms.

• Graphene oxide in agriculture, the origin of the coronavirus? ^{^136}
• Organic waste turned into graphene: high quality at a low price ^{^137}
• Food packaging with graphene oxide. Patents and studies ^{^138}
• Lactose-free dairy products and graphene oxide. Possible cause of lactose intolerance? ^{^139}

Videos

• Nano Particles & Vaccines in Food – Oct 2021 2mins
• Magnetic Chicken (Plenty of these videos are around) – Supermarket Chicken – June 2021 2mins

See also my posts tagged NWO-Food

Graphene Oxide for Water Supply Quality Control

1. Smart Water Summit ^{^140}
   • In this panel they had in Oct 2020, they talk about strategies for the “COVID” pandemic – talking about monitoring waste-water for viruses and emerging-viruses. (YouTube)
2. G20 – First commercial contract for graphene-oxide in water treatment facilities
   • 21 July 2021 – (G2O Water Technologies news release) ^{^141 ^142}
   • UK technology business G2O Water Technologies has landed its first commercial contract for the enhancement of water filtration membranes with graphene oxide.
3. Graphene Smart membranes can Control Water ^{^143}
   • The reported graphene smart membrane technology is not just limited to controlling the water flow. The same membrane can be used as a smart adsorbent or sponge. Water adsorbed on the membrane can be preserved in the membrane even in desert conditions if a current is applied. We could release this water on demand by switching the current off.”

“How to convince governments to spray graphene all over the population…”

• Khalifa University researchers share insights at the 2021 International Rain Enhancement Forum. Reduced graphene oxide to promote rainfall. Reduced graphene oxide serves as a template for ice crystal growth due to a similar hexagonal lattice structure, while the addition of silicon oxide nanoparticles improves the overall water adsorption capabilities of the composite particle. 

At the first virtual International Rain Enhancement Forum (IREF), researchers from Khalifa University shared their innovative methodologies and new insights to enhancing rainfall across the UAE.

Dr. Linda Zou, Professor of Civil Infrastructure and Environmental Engineering, introduced porous nanoparticles and their potential for cold cloud seeding. Cloud seeding is the process where substances are put into clouds to stimulate the formation of rain drops

Dr. Zou applies nanotechnology to conventional cloud seeding materials, engineering particles with optimal properties to ensure the maximum amount of ice nucleation. Reduced graphene oxide serves as the template for ice crystal growth due to a similar hexagonal lattice structure while the addition of silicon oxide nanoparticles enhances the overall water molecule adsorption capabilities of the composite particle.

The silicon oxide nanoparticles create pores in the final product and play an essential role in ice nucleation as liquid water collects in the pores. Dr. Zou’s experiments showed that the particles caused ice nucleation in temperatures of around -8° Celsius, with these results indicating how cold cloud seeding can be used in actual operations, including hailstorm suppression and fog reduction.

Khalifa University Researchers Share Knowledge at 2021 International Rain Enhancement Forum – Feb 17 2021

• Chemical clouds from the evaporation/volatilization/levitation of solutions with graphene and its ionization This entry analyzes the possibility that the chemical clouds observed in the sky not only correspond to chemtrails or fumigations carried out from airplanes. There is a high probability that there are chemical clouds produced by the evaporation of water/fertilizers/phytosanitary products/food additives and graphene. 

Chemical clouds from the evaporation/volatilization/levitation of solutions with graphene and its ionization – Analysis ^{^144}

See also:

• Graphene oxide in aviation fuels ^{^145}
• Injection of graphene oxide aerosols into the atmosphere: Solar geoengineering and the role of aerogels ^{^146}
• Tropospheric Aerosol Geoengineering TAG: Radiometric Evidence from Chemtrails ^{^147}
• Graphene oxide interferes in the nucleation of ice in the atmosphere ^{^148}
• Graphene oxide in aerosol droplets – Analysis ^{^149 ^150}
  • Graphene oxide ” GO ” can be prepared in the form of an aerosol and spread through any vector with adapted nebulizers, so that anyone could inhale it. The article acknowledges the possible applications in biomedicine for the administration of inhaled drugs
• Short-term inhalation study of graphene oxide nanoplates ^{^151}
• Spray-on Nanoparticle Mix Turns Trees Into Antennas (2012) – Video by Manufacturer of Technology ^{^152}
• Local large temperature difference and ultra-wideband photothermoelectric response of the silver nanostructure film/carbon nanotube film heterostructure ^{^153}

Amateur Videos:

• Magnetic Dust (collected from Car windscreen) – Europe

So far:

• Glutathione & NAC
• Lactic acid bacteria
• Zinc
• myeloperoxidase derived from human neutrophils
  • Human white blood cells in the presence of a low concentration of hydrogen peroxide
  • Nicotine
  • Horseradish? (Horseradish peroxidase)

My problem / scepticism with the publications that say our own immune system can degrade graphene (macrophages, myeloperoxidase / neutrophils), is not knowing if they have been sanctioned or are invested in the outcome that its somewhat “biodegradable” and thereby be able to promote it as ‘safe’ for human consumption, and thereby “opening up the pharma-windfall for all sorts of biomedicines & nanotechnology”, in addition to the gateway to put graphene in ‘everything’ – food, medicine, water, air, masks etc which is what they’ve done (did they need these studies in order to do that?). Just speaking out loud that I do not trust and will not trust unless the “science” is repeated by “honest” scientists with no vested interests or soul-selling involved (something very difficult these days to find). Graphene is big business – billions already invested by governments and pharmaceuticals alike. Nano & Bio-medicine is human slavery. ^{^116} Human 2.0 is their wet-dream. I want evidence from the “good guys” that these studies are trustworthy before I’d bank humanities life on it.

My other concern is that because there is no standardized “recipe” for the various graphene-based compositions, that these studies may not even cover whatever “version” we have to deal with now that it’s in everything – all using a different ‘recipe’, thereby studies are only valid for the ‘recipe’ they are testing.

• See also, the bottom of the post ‘Toxicity Of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles (Paper)‘ for my musings on what else we might try

A section to update regularly with anything I come across that might help us get this crap out of us since it seems to be used in everything including the water, agriculture, and weather.

Zinc & Glutathione

• Supplementing with zinc reduces mortality and recovery time in Covid (or being Graphinated) In this article they endorse zinc supplementation for the improvement of COVID19 disease. According to the investigation of THE FIFTH COLUMN, it is not because it prevents viral replication but because it will maintain optimal levels of the master antioxidant Glutathione and this manages to efficiently degrade the toxin that causes the disease; graphene oxide. ^{^154 ^155}
  “30 percent of the world’s population have zinc deficiency. The high incidence occurs in countries with poor cereal-based diets and these can cause skin problems, poor healing, alopecia, recurrent infections, short stature, sexual immaturity, fetal malformations, among others,” “The study was carried out between March and June. Among the results we highlight that the higher the level of zinc, the lower the level of inflammation. While a zinc deficiency accounts for higher mortality, longer time to reach clinical stability and there is greater admission to the ICU”

Lactic Acid Bacteria

• Lactic acid bacteria could protect from the toxicity of graphene oxide in the intestine Lactic acid bacteria, also known as BAL or LAB, prevented the toxicity of graphene oxide GO on primary and secondary target organ functions in nematodes. LAB blocked GO translocation into secondary target organs across the intestinal barrier while maintaining normal intestinal permeability .” “This information could be very important to help mitigate or counteract the effects of graphene oxide” ^{^156 ^157}

myeloperoxidase / neutrophils
(Neutrophils are a type of white blood cells. The neutrophils phagocytose or “eat” the graphene and secrete the enzyme myeloperoxidase that dissolves the graphene.)

• Graphene oxide biodegrades with help of human enzymes
  • Reporting their results in the journal Small, the researchers show that myeloperoxidase, derived from human white blood cells in the presence of a low concentration of hydrogen peroxide, can completely metabolize graphene oxide in the case of highly dispersed samples. ^{^158 ^159 ^160}
• Graphene oxide is degraded by neutrophils, and the degradation products are non-genotoxic. ^{^161}
• Degradation of Single-Layer and Few-Layer Graphene by Neutrophil Myeloperoxidase. ^{^162}
  • “Graphene can be degraded by human myeloperoxidase secreted by activated neutrophils, indicating that this material is not biopersistent.”
• Biodegradation of carbon nanohorns in macrophage cells ^{^163}
  • “With the rapid developments in the medical applications of carbon nanomaterials such as carbon nanohorns (CNHs), carbon nanotubes, and graphene based nanomaterials, understanding the long-term fate, health impact, excretion, and degradation of these materials has become crucial.”
  • “…60% of the CNHs was degraded within 24 h in a phosphate buffer solution containing myeloperoxidase. Furthermore, approximately 30% of the CNHs was degraded by both RAW 264.7 and THP-1 macrophage cells within 9 days.”

Increasing myeloperoxidase / neutrophils:

1. Nicotine
   • Acute pulmonary effects of aerosolized nicotine ^{^164}
     • “Lung myeloperoxidase mRNA and protein increased in the nicotine-exposed rats. Complete blood counts also showed an increase in neutrophils, white blood cells, eosinophils, and basophils.”
   • Increased neutrophil myeloperoxidase activity associated with cigarette smoking ^{^165}
     • “Neutrophils are recruited in greater numbers into the lungs of smokers“

1. Horseradish?
   • Biodegradation of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes through Enzymatic Catalysis ^{^166}
     • “By incubating nanotubes with a natural horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and low concentrations of H₂O₂ (∼40 μM) at 4 °C over 12 weeks under static conditions, we show the increased degradation of nanotube structure.”

1. Hypchlorite – for wastewater contamination (hmm.. I wonder if Chlorine Dioxide/CDS would work even better)… A Simple Method for Removal of Carbon Nanotubes from Wastewater Using Hypochlorite ^{^167}
   • “We demonstrate that hypochlorite can completely remove CNTs from aqueous solutions, suggesting a potential method for the removal of CNTs from CNT-containing industrial wastewater. Sodium hypochlorite and hypochlorous acid are inexpensive and environmentally friendly oxidizing agents that are commonly used as household bleaching or sterilizing agents“

But this study “Elevated Levels of Neutrophil Activated Proteins, Alpha-Defensins (DEFA1), Calprotectin (S100A8/A9) and Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Are Associated With Disease Severity in COVID-19 Patients” ^{^168} says “So far, accumulation of neutrophils and increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines are associated with disease severity in COVID-19 patients.” — but “funded by pharma” studies were trying to target NETs in COVID. Hmm.. hmm.. ponder. ^{^169}

Yeah BigPharma & psychopathic genocidal maniacs don’t like this myeloperoxidase getting in the way of their nefarious nano-tech takeover:

• Myeloperoxidase as an Active Disease Biomarker: Recent Biochemical and Pathological Perspectives ^{^170}
  • “In addition to the many positive roles of myeloperoxidase discussed above, this enzyme has some drawbacks as well. Carbon nanotubes are used as drug delivery vehicles by some clinicians, but myeloperoxidase remains a significant hurdle as this enzyme suddenly breaks down these vehicles, thus limiting its applications“

macrophages

• Confocal Raman imaging study showing macrophage-mediated biodegradation of graphene in vivo. ^{^171}

La Quinta Columna recommendations ^{^172}

Increase glutathione levels:

• It is vitally important to increase glutathione levels for mitigating the effects produced by graphene oxide on human health, and this is particularly crucial for those who decided to get vaccinated, but also for those who have not.
• Glutathione’s main function is to protect your cells and mitochondria from oxidative damage and peroxidation.
• Glutathione levels are extremely high in children, that is why the COVID-19 disease hardly ever has an incidence in the child population. On the contrary, glutathione falls very considerably after 65 years of age, which is why COVID-19 is particularly predominant in the elder population.

The three most important nutritional supplements are bolded:

• N-acetylcysteine (NAC)
• Zinc
• Melatonin
• Astaxanthin
• Quercetin
• Vitamin D3
• Milk Thistle.

Have a good diet to increase glutathione levels:

• Eating foods rich in sulfur, incorporating fruits and vegetables, protein intake and minimizing the consumption of processed foods will help to reduce the production of toxins.
• The chemical groups of sulfur are key in the glutathione molecule and for the elimination of toxins, you can consume foods rich in sulfur such as garlic, onion and cruciferous vegetables: broccoli, kale, cauliflower, and watercress, among others.

Yet to read:

• Biological interactions of carbon-based nanomaterials: From coronation to degradation. ^{^173}