Peter Daszak

Deception in America Episode One: The Tale of Peter Daszak

All roads lead to Peter Daszak – Feb 28, 2021 ^{^01}

Dec 9 2019 – Daszak Works with Wuhan Lab to create bioweapons (Gain of Function coronaviruses i.e. makes coronaviruses more lethal to humans)

3 weeks before Wuhan announced an outbreak of a new form of pneumonia, virologist Vincent Racaniello interviewed British zoologist and president of EcoHealth Alliance Peter Daszak about his work at the nonprofit to protect the world from the emergence of new diseases and predict pandemics. ^{^02}

The video interview was originally filmed on December 9, 2019.

Interview – TWiV 615: Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance

See full post: COVID-19 Research Awarded By DoD To Ukraine Special Projects In November 2019

Since 2014, Daszak’s organization has received millions of dollars of funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), which it has funnelled to the WIV to carry out research on bat coronaviruses.

In the first phase of research, which took place from 2014 to 2019, Daszak coordinated with Shi Zhengli, (石正麗), “BatWoman,” at the WIV on investigating and cataloguing bat coronaviruses across China.

EcoHealth Alliance received US$3.7 million in funding from the NIH for this research and 10 percent was channelled to the WIV, reported NPR.

The second, more dangerous phase, which started in 2019, involved gain-of-function (GoF) research on coronaviruses and chimeras in humanized mice from the lab of Ralph S. Baric of the University of North Carolina.

Funding for the program was withdrawn by the NIH under the Trump administration on April 27 amid the pandemic. At the 28:10 mark of the podcast interview, Daszak states that researchers found that SARS likely originated from bats and then set out to find more SARS-related coronaviruses, eventually finding over 100. He observed that some coronaviruses can “get into human cells in the lab,” and others can cause SARS disease in “humanized mouse models.”

He warned that such coronaviruses are “untreatable with therapeutic monoclonals [antibodies] and you can’t vaccinate against them with a vaccine.” Ironically, he claims that his team’s goal was trying to find the next “spill over event” that could cause the next pandemic, mere weeks before cases of COVID-19 were beginning to be reported in Wuhan.

Daszak at the 29:54 mark appears to reveal that the goal of the GoF experiments was to develop a pan-coronavirus vaccine for many different types of coronaviruses.

Based on his response, it is evident that just before the start of the pandemic, the WIV was modifying coronaviruses in the lab. “You can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily.” What he then mentioned has become the tell-tale trait of SARS-CoV-2, its spike protein: “Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus, zoonotic risk.“

Daszak mentions the WIV’s collaboration with Baric: “and we work with Ralph Baric at UNC [University of North Carolina] to do this.” As has been suggested by proponents that SARS-CoV-2 is a chimera made in a lab, he speaks of inserting the spike protein “into a backbone of another virus” and then doing “some work in the lab.” These experiments appeared to have included infecting mice genetically modified to express the human ACE2 protein with these chimeras. ^{^03}

Feb 19, 2020 – Daszak Instigates Fake Lancet letter to denounce Lab-origin

Group of 27 Scientists open letter published in The Lancet “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.” with references, drafted and promoted by Peter Daszak ^{^04}

However an investigation into that letter shows a serious conflict of interest, identifying EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak (who has published studies with batwoman about bat SARS-like coronaviruses) ^{^05 ^06 ^07} & is PRESIDENT of the company that was collaborating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the genetic engineering of coronaviruses.” ^{^08} as the one who drafted the Lancet statement! ^{^09 ^10} and that he intended it to “not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person” but rather to be seen as “simply a letter from leading scientists” …“to avoid the appearance of a political statement.” ^{^11}

In November 2020 the Watchdog group, US Right-to-Know, reported the following with respect to the Lancet article:

Emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know show that a statement in The Lancet authored by 27 prominent public health scientists condemning “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin” was organized by employees of EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit group that has received millions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer funding to genetically manipulate coronaviruses with scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The emails obtained via public records requests show that EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak drafted the Lancet statement, and that he intended it to “not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person” but rather to be seen as “simply a letter from leading scientists”. Daszak wrote that he wanted “to avoid the appearance of a political statement“.

EcoHealth Alliance orchestrated key scientists’ statement on “natural origin” of SARS-CoV-2 ^{^11}

A separate, worrisome article entitled, “Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance Has Hidden Almost $40 Million In Pentagon Funding And Militarized Pandemic Science” seems to indicate a serious conflict of interest with respect to Dr. Daszak’s participation in any investigations on the origin of SARS-CoV-2. ^{^12}

Feb 6, 2020 – Dazak Drafts Lancet letter to denounce Lab-Origin & opts to keep his identity secret

Daszak from EcoHealth Alliance drafts the letter “from leading scientists” for the Lancet supporting zoological and calling lab-leak a conspiracy. Daszak evidently did not want this connection to become widely known. He stressed in emails that the “statement will not have EcoHealth Alliance logo on it and will not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person,” so that it will be seen as “simply a letter from leading scientists.” ^{^13} It was in fact signed not only by Daszak, but by five of his EcoHealth colleagues as well. (The entire tranche of emails is archived here: EcoHealth Alliance emails: University of Maryland.) ^{^14}

Lancet Letter EcoHealth Editors

Signatures on the Lancet letter: Calisher C, Carroll D, Colwell R, Corley RB, Daszak P, Drosten C, Enjuanes L, Farrar J, Field H, Golding J, Gorbalenya A, Haagmans B, Hughes JM, Karesh WB, Keusch GT, Lam SK, Lubroth J, Mackenzie JS, Madoff L, Mazet J, Palese P, Perlman S, Poon L, Roizman B, Saif L, Subbarao K, Turner M ^{^15}

How many were existing EcoHealth editors?

1. Christian Drosten, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany
2. Hume Field, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
3. Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
4. William B. Karesh, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
5. Rita R. Colwell, University of Maryland, Biotechnology Institute, USA
6. John Mackenzie, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia

April 18, 2020 – Daszak thanks Fauci for denouncing lab-origin

Daszak sent email to Fauci thanking him for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. ^{^16}

Conservatives call for Dr Anthony Fauci to be fired after leaked emails spark backlash – June 3, 2021, Sky News ^{^17}

July 8, 2020 – Trump removes his NIH Funded Grant

(Trump) NIH Grant withdraws funding from EcoHealth Alliance due to bio-safety concerns at the Wuhan Lab. It reinstated the grant but suspended its research activities until EcoHealth Alliance fulfilled seven conditions, included: providing information on the disappearance of a Wuhan Institute of Virology researcher believed to be patient zero, explaining diminished cell phone traffic and roadblocks around the WIV in October 2019, disclosing who they give their sub-awards to, arranging inspection of WIV lab, and an explanation as to why WIV failed to disclose the RaTG13 – the coronavirus closest to SARS-CoV-2. ^{^18 ^19}

Letter

Dear Drs. Chmura and Daszak:

In follow-up to my previous letter of April 24, 2020, I am writing to notify you that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), an Institute within the National Institutes of Health (NIH), under the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), has withdrawn its termination of grant R01AI110964, which supports the project Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence. Accordingly, the grant is reinstated.

However, as you are aware, the NIH has received reports that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), a subrecipient of EcoHealth Alliance under R01AI110964, has been conducting research at its facilities in China that pose serious bio-safety concerns and, as a result, create health and welfare threats to the public in China and other countries, including the United States. Grant award R01AI110964 is subject to biosafety requirements set forth in the NIH Grants Policy Statement (e.g., NIH GPS, Section 4.1.24 “Public Health Security”) and the Notice of Award (e.g., requiring that “Research funded under this grant must adhere to the [CDC/NIH Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL)].”). Moreover, NIH grant recipients are expected to provide safe working conditions for their employees and foster work environments conducive to high-quality research. NIH GPS, Section 4. The terms and conditions of the grant award flow down to subawards to subrecipients. 45 C.F.R. § 75.101.

As the grantee, EcoHealth Alliance was required to “monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward . . .” 45 C.F.R. § 75.352(d). We have concerns that WIV has not satisfied safety requirements under the award, and that EcoHealth Alliance has not satisfied its obligations to monitor the activities of its subrecipient to ensure compliance.

Moreover, as we have informed you through prior Notices of Award, this award is subject to the Transparency Act subaward and executive compensation reporting requirement of 2 C.F.R. Part 170. To date you have not reported any subawards in the Federal Subaward Reporting System.

Therefore, effective the date of this letter, July 8, 2020, NIH is suspending all activities related to R01AI110964, until such time as these concerns have been addressed to NIH’s satisfaction. This suspension is taken in accordance with 45 C.F.R. § 75.371, Remedies for Noncompliance, which permits suspension of award activities in cases of non-compliance, and the NIH GPS, Section 8.5.2, which permits NIH to take immediate action to suspend a grant when necessary to protect the public health and welfare. This action is not appealable in accordance with 42 C.F.R. § 50.404 and the NIH GPS Section 8.7, Grant Appeals Procedures. However, EcoHealth Alliance has the opportunity to provide information and documentation demonstrating that WIV and EcoHealth Alliance have satisfied the above-mentioned requirements.

Specifically, to address the NIH’s concerns, EcoHealth must provide the NIH with the following information and materials, which must be complete and accurate:

1. Provide an aliquot of the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus that WIV used to determine the viral sequence.
2. Explain the apparent disappearance of Huang Yanling, a scientist / technician who worked in the WIV lab but whose lab web presence has been deleted.
3. Provide the NIH with WIV’s responses to the 2018 U.S. Department of State cables regarding safety concerns.
4. Disclose and explain out-of-ordinary restrictions on laboratory facilities, as suggested, for example, by diminished cell-phone traffic in October 2019, and the evidence that there may have been roadblocks surrounding the facility from October 14-19, 2019.
5. Explain why WIV failed to note that the RaTG13 virus, the bat-derived coronavirus in its collection with the greatest similarity to SARS-CoV-2, was actually isolated from an abandoned mine where three men died in 2012 with an illness remarkably similar to COVID-19, and explain why this was not followed up.
6. Additionally, EcoHealth Alliance must arrange for WIV to submit to an outside inspection team charged to review the lab facilities and lab records, with specific attention to addressing the question of whether WIV staff had SARS-CoV-2 in their possession prior to December 2019. The inspection team should be granted full access to review the processes and safety of procedures of all of the WIV field work (including but not limited to collection of animals and biospecimens in caves, abandoned man-made underground cavities, or outdoor sites). The inspection team could be organized by NIAID, or, if preferred, by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences.
7. Lastly, EcoHealth Alliance must ensure that all of its subawards are fully reported in the Federal Subaward Reporting System

During this period of suspension, NIH will continue to review the activities under this award, taking into consideration information provided by EcoHealth Alliance, to further asses compliance by EcoHealth Alliance and WIV, including compliance with other terms and conditions of award that may be implicated. Additionally, during the period of suspension, EcoHealth Alliance may not allow research under this project to be conducted. Further, no funds from grant R01AI110964 may be provided to or expended by EcoHealth Alliance or any subrecipients; all such charges are unallowable. It is EcoHealth Alliance’s responsibility as the recipient of this grant award to ensure that the terms of this suspension are communicated to and understood by all subrecipients. EcoHealth Alliance must provide adequate oversight to ensure compliance with the terms of the suspension. Any noncompliance of the terms of this suspension must be immediately reported to NIH. Once the original award is reinstated, NIH will take additional steps to restrict all funding in the HHS Payment Management System in the amount of $369,819. EcoHealth Alliance will receive a revised Notice of Award from NIAID indicating the suspension of these research activities and funding restrictions as a specific condition of award.

Please note that this action does not preclude NIH from taking additional corrective or enforcement actions pursuant to 45 CFR Part 75, including, but not limited to, terminating the grant award. NIH may also take other remedies that may be legally available if NIH discovers other violations of terms and conditions of award on the part of EcoHealth Alliance or WIV.

Sincerely,

Michael S Lauer, MD

NIH Deputy Director for Extramural Research ^{^20}

Nov 26, 2020 – WHO selects Daszak (of all people) to inspect Wuhan Lab – the main guy with the MOST to lose if it’s found to be of lab-origin – “THE” MAIN GUY. #CantMakeThisUp!

World Health Organization released the names of the 10 scientists selected in coordination with the Chinese government to visit Wuhan to assess the origins of the pandemic. ^{^21}

“Daszak was named by the World Health Organization as the sole U.S.-based representative on a team sent to investigate origins of the COVID-19 pandemic …” (Wikipedia)

Peter Daszak listed as one of the scientists? THE ONLY U.S. SCIENTIST SELECTED.

If the pandemic stems from an accidental leak of one of these viruses, Peter would potentially be implicated. Clear conflict of interest as he has everything riding on it “NOT” being a lab-leak. ^{^22}

“I have great respect for Peter but his clear conflict of interest and [prior] funding relationship with WIV should preclude him from these types of roles.”

“Peter’s organization worked closely with the Wuhan Institute of virology and supported gain of function research on bat coronaviruses. If the pandemic stems from an accidental leak of one of these viruses, Peter would potentially be implicated.

I am not at all suggesting that he did anything wrong, just that one of the possible origin stories includes him. Because so much is riding on this investigation, I think it essential that we make sure the commission itself represents a balance of perspectives, while excluding conspiracy theorists and people with political axes to grind…Putting together a commission that is both impartial and balanced and seen as being impartial and balanced will be critical for everything that follows.” ^{^22}

In February 2021, Daszak says it’s “extremely unlikely” to be lab-origin

Feb 11, 2021 WHO Wuhan visit a ‘circular investigation’ ^{^23}

In February 2021, the WHO (Embarek) echo’s that it’s “extremely unlikely” to be lab-origin

World Health Organisation virus expert Peter Ben Embarek said findings suggest that the hypothesis of a possible “laboratory leak” is “extremely unlikely,” and does not explain the virus’s introduction into the human population. ^{^24}

In August 2021, World Health Organization pushes for lab leak investigation because the Wuhan Team admit they Lied about the Lab-Leak Origin. #CantMakeThisUp!

14 Aug 2021 W.H.O. Committee member Jamie Metzl says China lied and downplayed the possibility of a lab leak. #FoxNews ^{^25}

According to investigative research done by independent-journalist Sam Husseini and The Intercept, much of the money awarded to EcoHealth Alliance did not focus on health or ecology, but rather on biowarfare, bioterrorism, and other dangerous uses of deadly pathogens., much of the money awarded to EcoHealth Alliance did not focus on health or ecology, but rather on biowarfare, bioterrorism, and other dangerous uses of deadly pathogens. ^{^27 ^28}

EcoHealth Journal Editors

Editor in Chief

• Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA

Executive Editors

• Joshua P. Rosenthal, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, USA
• >>> Martyn Jeggo, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Australia <<< (Director at CSIRO)
• Phil Weinstein, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

Managing Editor

• Aleksei Chmura, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA

Assistant Managing Editor

• Alison Andre, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA

Associate Editors

• Rita R. Colwell, University of Maryland, Biotechnology Institute, USA
• Jean Lebel, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada
• Mary Pearl, Macaulay Honors College at CUNY, New York, USA

Review Editors

Australia & New Zealand:

• Michelle Baker, CSIRO Animal Food and Health Sciences Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Victoria, Australia
• David Williams, CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Victoria, Australia
• Clare Duncan, Deakin University, Australia
• Martin Breed, Flinders University, Australia (UN, WHO)
• Andrew Breed, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Australia
• Scott Carver, School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Australia

• Simon Hales, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
• David T .S. Hayman, mEpiLab, Infectious Disease Research Centre, Massey University, New Zealand

Canada:

• Martin Bunch, York University, Toronto, Canada
• Brenda Roche, Wellesley Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• Sarah Olson, Wildlife Conservation Society, British Columbia, Canada
• Atanu Sarkar, Memorial University, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Europe/UK:

• >>> Christian Drosten, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany <<<
• Sophie O. Vanwambeke, Department of Geography, UCLouvain, Belgium
• Mark Fielder, Kingston University, London, UK
• Kris Murray, Imperial College, London, UK
• Robert Puschendorf, School of Biological Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
• Tony Sainsbury, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, UK

Asia, Africa, Latin America:

• Danielle Anderson, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
• Andrew J. J. Macintosh, Wildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, Japan
• Roberto Briceño-León, Laboratory of Social Sciences, Central University of Venezuela, Venezuela
• Delia Grace, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya

Mexico:

• Janine Ramsey, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Tapachula, Mexico
• Benjamin Roche, International Center for Mathematical & Computational Modeling of Complex Systems, Research Institute for Development, Mexico
• Ilse Ruiz-Mercado, Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustenabilidad, CONTACYT-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Mexico
• Gerardo Suzán, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

USA:

• Timothy Bouley, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA
• Emily Gurley, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
• Anita Shankar, School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
• Pamela Jagger, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
• Jay P. Graham, Public Health Institute, Oakland, California, USA
• Andy Dobson, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
• Stephen P. Luby, Centre for Innovation in Global Health, Stanford University, California, USA
• Tee Guidotti, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington D.C., USA
• Amy Sims, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Washington, USA
• Helen Petach, United States Agency for International Development, Washington D.C., USA
• Maria Diuk-Wasser, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, USA
• Evan Eskew, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
• Stephanie Factor, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, USA
• Yasha Feferholtz, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
• Hume Field, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
• William B. Karesh, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
• Parviez Hosseini, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
• Kim Knowlton, Natural Resources Defense Council, New York, USA
• Sergios-Orestis Kolokotronis, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, New York, USA
• Alice Latinne, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
• Anne Laudisoit, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
• Katherine Lee, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
• Sumi Mehta, Vital Strategies, New York, USA
• Kevin Olival, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
• Katherine Dickinson, University of Colorado-Boulder, and National Center for Atmospheric Research, Colorado
• Amy T. Gilbert, National Wildlife Research Center, USDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
• Kim Pepin, National Wildlife Research Center, USDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
• Daniel J. Salkeld, Colorado State University, USA
• Craig Starger, School of Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University, USA
• Healani Chang, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA
• Nancy Lewis, East-West Center, Hawaii, USA
• A. Alonso Aguirre, Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation, George Mason University, Front Royal, VA, USA
• Simon J. Anthony, Center for Immunology and Infection, Columbia University, USA
• Rob Bailis, Stockholm Environment Institute – US Center, Somerville, MA
• Kevin Berry, Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, USA
• Celia Chen, Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire, USA
• Myra Finkelstein, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
• Thomas R. Gillespie, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
• Tony Goldberg, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
• Peter J. Hudson, Penn State University, University Park, USA
• A. Marm Kilpatrick, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
• Sarah LaMere, University of California, San Diego, USA
• Karen Levy, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
• Courtney Murdock, University of Georgia, USA
• Felicia B. Nutter, Department of Infectious Disease and Global Health, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA
• William Kuang-yao Pan, Duke University, North Carolina, USA
• Katey Pelican, Ecosystem Health Division, Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, USA
• Tom Raffel, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
• Tonie Rocke, USGS National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, USA
• Jason Rohr, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
• Daniel Streicker, University of Georgia, Athens, USA
• James A. Trostle, Anthropology Department, Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
• Daniel P. Walsh, USGS National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
• Xiangming Xiao, Center for Spatial Analysis, University of Oklahoma, USA

Editorial Advisors

CDC/WHO/WEF/YGL/CIA/DoD/WuhanLab/UkraineBioLabs/Pentagon/DARPA:

• Jan Semenza, European Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden
• Johannes Sommerfeld, Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
• Xiao-Nong Zhou, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, PR China
• >>> Nathan Wolfe, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA <<<

Other:

• Pierre Horwitz, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia
• John Mackenzie, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia
• Mardie Townsend, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
• Renaud De Plaen, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada
• Margot W. Parkes, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
• Robert Lannigan, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
• Colin L. Soskolne, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
• David Waltner-Toews, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
• Ulisses Confalonieri, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
• Andrew Cunningham, Institute of Zoology, London, UK
• Pim Martens, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
• Maj-Lis Foller, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
• Andrew Githeko, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya
• Shuyi Zhang, School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
• Jonathan A. Patz, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
• Les Real, Emory University, Atlanta, USA

• Source:
  • EcoHealth Journal Editors: ecohealth.net/journal-editors ^{^29}

EcoHealth Whistleblower Dr Andrew Huff believes Daszak is working with the CIA and could be a double-agent working on behalf of the Chinese government

On January 12, 2022, Dr. Andrew Huff issued a public statement (on Twitter) in which he claimed, Peter Daszak, the President of EcoHealth Alliance, told him that he was working for the CIA. ^{^30}

Dr. Andrew Huff’s full statement below:

Feb 26, 2022, Dr. Andrew Huff, a scientist who worked with Peter Daszak at the EcoHealth Alliance, sent a whistle-blower complaint to Senator Gary Peters, the Chairman of the Senate Whistle-blower committee, stating that he believes Daszak works with the CIA and could in fact be “a double agent working on behalf of the Chinese government.” ^{^31}

Feb 16, 2022 Former Senior Executive Says EcoHealth Approached by CIA. A former senior executive at EcoHealth Alliance, an American research organization that allegedly sponsored gain-of-function experiments on bat coronaviruses at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, sent whistleblower letters to Congress this month describing the group as a United States intelligence operation. ^{^32 ^33}

Clip: Rumble | Download: Telegram | Full Interview: YouTube

Was Peter Daszak Working For The Central Intelligence Agency? An EcoHealth Alliance whistleblower steps forward. JAN 19, 2022 ^{^34}

On 20 September 2022, Dr Andrew Huff submitted his sworn testimony to the Senate. On Twitter, he wrote:

“Below is link to the copy of the report about the REAL Origin of SARS-CoV2 sent to the US Senate and Congress last week. My declaration in the document was provided under oath with penalty of perjury.“

• Link to Tweet ^{^36}
• Link to Testimony (PDF on Renz-Law.com) ^{^37}

Evidence included herein demonstrate the following key points (amongst others):

1. SARS-COV2 was created in the lab in Wuhan, China;
2. Anthony Fauci funded the creation of SARS-COV2 and lied to Congress about funding
   Gain-of-Function work;
3. The US Intelligence Community was aware of and appeared to have been involved with
   the funding of said Gain-of-Function work;
4. A number of well-connected public and private partners were involved in the Gain-of-Function work that resulted in the creation and release of SARS-COV2;
5. Anthony Fauci and others coordinated to cover-up the funding of the Gain-of-Function
   work that resulted in SARS-COV2.

• Wuhan Collaborator Peter Daszak Demands Nearly $1 TRILLION To Fund ‘Pandemic Prevention’ Efforts. APRIL 15, 2022 (The Pulse) ^{^38}
  • Wuhan Collaborator Peter Daszak Demands $1 Trillion To Fund Pandemic Prevention Efforts. APRIL 20, 2022 (Great Game India – Includes document). ^{^39}
• Fauci’s Colleague Offered to Secretly Erase a COVID-19 Paper Containing Data Hidden By China. It Happened During an ‘Extremely Contentious’ Zoom Call Which Saw Scientists ‘Yelling at Each Other’ . APRIL 4, 2022 (The Pulse) ^{^40}
• COVID-19 is Man-Made: From Fauci, to Gates, to Daszak; a Timeline of Bio-Terror. APRIL 19, 2022 (The Expose) ^{^41}
• GOP to Becerra: Investigate Unethical Behavior of EcoHealth’s Dr. Peter Daszak. APRIL 20, 2022 (Uncover DC) ^{^42}
• EcoHealth Alliance: Whistleblower Exposes Corruption. FEBRUARY 9, 2022 (Uncover DC) ^{^43}
• Hunter Biden Invested In A Pandemic Firm Collaborating With Daszak’s EcoHealth and The Wuhan Lab. JUNE 28, 2021 (The Pulse) ^{^44}
• The doctor who denied COVID-19 was leaked from a lab had this major bias. JANUARY 16, 2021 (New York Post) ^{^45}

• Who is the Virus Hunter Dr. Nathan Wolfe? APRIL 13, 2022. (Expose) ^{^46}
• A shady Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell connected character, Nathan Wolfe connects to the Wuhan Lab. ^{^47}
• Biolabs in Ukraine: Who are Metabiota’s investors? ^{^48}

• U.S. Firm With Ties to WEF, DOD Implicated in Bioweapons Cover-Up ^{^49}
  • As evidence of a potential bioweapons cover-up begins to emerge, a company called Metabiota, whose founder is a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader graduate, is gaining prominence.
  • Metabiota’s mission is to make the world more resilient to epidemics by providing “data, analytics, advice and training to prepare for global health threats and mitigate their impacts.” Its founder is a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader graduate.
  • Metabiota investors include In-Q-Tel, a CIA venture capital firm that specializes in high-tech investments that support or benefit the intelligence capacity of U.S. intelligence agencies, Hunter Biden’s investment fund, Rosemont Seneca and the U.S. Department of Defense’s Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), which contracted Metabiota to run operations in U.S.-connected labs in Ukraine.
  • In addition to having close ties to the WEF and its Great Reset agenda, Nathan Wolfe, the founder of Metabiota, has also served on the EcoHealth Alliance’s editorial board since 2004. In 2017, he co-wrote a study on coronaviruses in bats together with EcoHealth president Peter Daszak, Ph.D. EcoHealth worked closely with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China, where SARS-CoV-2 is suspected of having originated.
  • Metabiota’s Global Partnerships are led by Andrew C. Weber, former assistant secretary of defense for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Defense, who created the DTRA.